Demographics details for Moorpark, CA vs Overland park, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Moorpark, CA vs Overland park, KS.
Data | Moorpark | Overland park |
---|---|---|
Population | 35,514 | 197,726 |
Median Age | 38.8 years | 38.4 years |
Median Income | $143,218 | $100,876 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Moorpark vs Overland park
- The population in Overland park is higher at 197,726, compared to 35,514 in Moorpark.
- Residents in Moorpark have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 38.4 years in Overland park.
- Moorpark has a higher median income of $143,218 compared to $100,876 in Overland park.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Moorpark at 47.0% compared to 44.0% in Overland park.
- Moorpark has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 6% in Overland park.
- The unemployment rate in Moorpark is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.3% in Overland park.
Demographics
Demographics Moorpark vs Overland park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Moorpark | Overland park |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 5 |
White | 38 | 74 |
Asian | 7 | 9 |
Hispanic | 34 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 17 | 5 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Moorpark vs Overland park
- In Overland park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 3% in Moorpark.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Overland park at 74% compared to 38% in Moorpark.
- In Overland park, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 7% in Moorpark.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Moorpark at 34% compared to 7% in Overland park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Moorpark at 17% compared to 5% in Overland park.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Moorpark at 1% compared to 0% in Overland park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Moorpark | Overland park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 12.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.9% | 6.9% |
Depression | 17.6% | 18.3% |
Smoking | 9.2% | 9.6% |
Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 19.7% |
Obesity | 24.7% | 28.6% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Moorpark vs Overland park
- More residents in Moorpark report poor mental health at 13.8% compared to 12.2% in Overland park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Overland park at 18.3% versus 17.6% in Moorpark.
- Overland park has a higher smoking rate at 9.6% compared to 9.2% in Moorpark.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Overland park at 19.7% compared to 17.8% in Moorpark.
- Overland park has higher obesity rates at 28.6% compared to 24.7% in Moorpark.
- Disability percentages are higher in Moorpark at 10.0% compared to 8.0% in Overland park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Moorpark | Overland park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (300) | 0.5% (897) |
High School Diploma | 9.3% (3,304) | 7.1% (13,953) |
Less than High School | 11.8% (4,201) | 3.3% (6,590) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.1% (10,699) | 43.1% (85,152) |
Education Levels Comparison: Moorpark vs Overland park
- A higher percentage of residents in Moorpark have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.5% in Overland park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Moorpark hold a high school diploma at 9.3% compared to 7.1% in Overland park.
- More residents in Moorpark have less than a high school education at 11.8% compared to 3.3% in Overland park.
- In Overland park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 43.1% compared to 30.1% in Moorpark.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.