Demographics details for Moorpark, CA vs Ostrander, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Moorpark, CA vs Ostrander, MN.
| Data | Moorpark | Ostrander |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 35,514 | 227 |
| Median Age | 38.8 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $143,218 | $69,583 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 52.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Moorpark vs Ostrander
- In Moorpark, the population is higher at 35,514, compared to 227 in Ostrander.
- Residents in Moorpark have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 37.8 years in Ostrander.
- Moorpark has a higher median income of $143,218 compared to $69,583 in Ostrander.
- In Ostrander, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 47.0% in Moorpark.
- Moorpark has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 5% in Ostrander.
- The unemployment rate in Moorpark is higher at 4.1%, compared to 2.5% in Ostrander.
Demographics
Demographics Moorpark vs Ostrander provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Moorpark | Ostrander |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 3 |
| White | 38 | 92 |
| Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 34 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Moorpark vs Ostrander
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Moorpark and Ostrander at 3%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ostrander at 92% compared to 38% in Moorpark.
- The Asian population is larger in Moorpark at 7% compared to 0% in Ostrander.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Moorpark at 34% compared to 0% in Ostrander.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Moorpark at 17% compared to 4% in Ostrander.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Moorpark and Ostrander at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Moorpark | Ostrander |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.9% | 10.0% |
| Depression | 17.6% | 23.3% |
| Smoking | 9.2% | 19.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 20.8% |
| Obesity | 24.7% | 34.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Moorpark vs Ostrander
- In Ostrander, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 13.8% in Moorpark.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Ostrander at 23.3% versus 17.6% in Moorpark.
- Ostrander has a higher smoking rate at 19.7% compared to 9.2% in Moorpark.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ostrander at 20.8% compared to 17.8% in Moorpark.
- Ostrander has higher obesity rates at 34.7% compared to 24.7% in Moorpark.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ostrander at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Moorpark.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Moorpark | Ostrander |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (300) | 0.9% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 9.3% (3,304) | 33.5% (76) |
| Less than High School | 11.8% (4,201) | 17.6% (40) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.1% (10,699) | 17.2% (39) |
Education Levels Comparison: Moorpark vs Ostrander
- In Ostrander, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.8% in Moorpark.
- In Ostrander, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 33.5% compared to 9.3% in Moorpark.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ostrander at 17.6%, compared to 11.8% in Moorpark.
- A higher percentage of residents in Moorpark hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.1% compared to 17.2% in Ostrander.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.