Demographics details for Moorpark, CA vs Loves park, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Moorpark, CA vs Loves park, IL.
| Data | Moorpark | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 35,514 | 23,365 |
| Median Age | 38.8 years | 36.6 years |
| Median Income | $143,218 | $56,370 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Moorpark vs Loves park
- In Moorpark, the population is higher at 35,514, compared to 23,365 in Loves park.
- Residents in Moorpark have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 36.6 years in Loves park.
- Moorpark has a higher median income of $143,218 compared to $56,370 in Loves park.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Moorpark at 47.0% compared to 35.0% in Loves park.
- The poverty level is higher in Loves park at 9%, compared to 8% in Moorpark.
- The unemployment rate in Moorpark is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.6% in Loves park.
Demographics
Demographics Moorpark vs Loves park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Moorpark | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 7 |
| White | 38 | 71 |
| Asian | 7 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 34 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Moorpark vs Loves park
- In Loves park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 3% in Moorpark.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Loves park at 71% compared to 38% in Moorpark.
- The Asian population is larger in Moorpark at 7% compared to 3% in Loves park.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Moorpark at 34% compared to 10% in Loves park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Moorpark at 17% compared to 9% in Loves park.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Moorpark at 1% compared to 0% in Loves park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Moorpark | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.9% | 11.3% |
| Depression | 17.6% | 21.3% |
| Smoking | 9.2% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 24.7% | 39.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Moorpark vs Loves park
- In Loves park, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 13.8% in Moorpark.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Loves park at 21.3% versus 17.6% in Moorpark.
- Loves park has a higher smoking rate at 17.0% compared to 9.2% in Moorpark.
- Binge drinking is more common in Moorpark at 17.8% compared to 17.0% in Loves park.
- Loves park has higher obesity rates at 39.4% compared to 24.7% in Moorpark.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Loves park at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Moorpark.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Moorpark | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (300) | 0.4% (97) |
| High School Diploma | 9.3% (3,304) | 17.1% (3,994) |
| Less than High School | 11.8% (4,201) | 9.7% (2,262) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.1% (10,699) | 17.4% (4,064) |
Education Levels Comparison: Moorpark vs Loves park
- A higher percentage of residents in Moorpark have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.4% in Loves park.
- In Loves park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.1% compared to 9.3% in Moorpark.
- More residents in Moorpark have less than a high school education at 11.8% compared to 9.7% in Loves park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Moorpark hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.1% compared to 17.4% in Loves park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.