Demographics details for Moorpark, CA vs Garland, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Moorpark, CA vs Garland, TX.
| Data | Moorpark | Garland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 35,514 | 240,854 |
| Median Age | 38.8 years | 34.4 years |
| Median Income | $143,218 | $71,044 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Moorpark vs Garland
- The population in Garland is higher at 240,854, compared to 35,514 in Moorpark.
- Residents in Moorpark have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 34.4 years in Garland.
- Moorpark has a higher median income of $143,218 compared to $71,044 in Garland.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Moorpark at 47.0% compared to 39.0% in Garland.
- The poverty level is higher in Garland at 12%, compared to 8% in Moorpark.
- The unemployment rate in Moorpark is higher at 4.1%, compared to 4.0% in Garland.
Demographics
Demographics Moorpark vs Garland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Moorpark | Garland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 16 |
| White | 38 | 6 |
| Asian | 7 | 11 |
| Hispanic | 34 | 45 |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 21 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Moorpark vs Garland
- In Garland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 16% compared to 3% in Moorpark.
- Moorpark has a higher percentage of White residents at 38% compared to 6% in Garland.
- In Garland, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 7% in Moorpark.
- Garland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 45%, compared to 34% in Moorpark.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Garland at 21%, compared to 17% in Moorpark.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Moorpark and Garland at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Moorpark | Garland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.9% | 12.1% |
| Depression | 17.6% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 9.2% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 24.7% | 33.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Moorpark vs Garland
- In Garland, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 13.8% in Moorpark.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Garland at 22.2% versus 17.6% in Moorpark.
- Garland has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 9.2% in Moorpark.
- Binge drinking is more common in Moorpark at 17.8% compared to 17.6% in Garland.
- Garland has higher obesity rates at 33.9% compared to 24.7% in Moorpark.
- Disability percentages are higher in Moorpark at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Garland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Moorpark | Garland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (300) | 2.5% (6,080) |
| High School Diploma | 9.3% (3,304) | 13.9% (33,524) |
| Less than High School | 11.8% (4,201) | 24.7% (59,406) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.1% (10,699) | 15.5% (37,249) |
Education Levels Comparison: Moorpark vs Garland
- In Garland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.8% in Moorpark.
- In Garland, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.9% compared to 9.3% in Moorpark.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Garland at 24.7%, compared to 11.8% in Moorpark.
- A higher percentage of residents in Moorpark hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.1% compared to 15.5% in Garland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.