Demographics details for Moorhead, MN vs Shrub oak, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Moorhead, MN vs Shrub oak, NY.
| Data | Moorhead | Shrub oak |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 44,861 | 3,002 |
| Median Age | 31.0 years | 36.6 years |
| Median Income | $68,680 | $128,832 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Moorhead vs Shrub oak
- In Moorhead, the population is higher at 44,861, compared to 3,002 in Shrub oak.
- The median age in Shrub oak is higher at 36.6 years, compared to 31.0 years in Moorhead.
- Shrub oak has a higher median income of $128,832, compared to $68,680 in Moorhead.
- In Shrub oak, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 33.0% in Moorhead.
- Moorhead has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Shrub oak.
- Shrub oak has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.0% in Moorhead.
Demographics
Demographics Moorhead vs Shrub oak provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Moorhead | Shrub oak |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 2 |
| White | 81 | 64 |
| Asian | 2 | 15 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 1 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Moorhead vs Shrub oak
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Moorhead at 6% compared to 2% in Shrub oak.
- Moorhead has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 64% in Shrub oak.
- In Shrub oak, the Asian population stands at 15%, greater than 2% in Moorhead.
- Shrub oak has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 5% in Moorhead.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Moorhead at 5% compared to 1% in Shrub oak.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Moorhead at 1% compared to 0% in Shrub oak.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Moorhead | Shrub oak |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 13.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 8.2% |
| Depression | 26.5% | 19.7% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 11.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.0% | 18.1% |
| Obesity | 35.6% | 25.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Moorhead vs Shrub oak
- More residents in Moorhead report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 13.2% in Shrub oak.
- Depression is more prevalent in Moorhead at 26.5% compared to 19.7% in Shrub oak.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Moorhead at 17.2% compared to 11.3% in Shrub oak.
- Binge drinking is more common in Moorhead at 19.0% compared to 18.1% in Shrub oak.
- Obesity rates are higher in Moorhead at 35.6% compared to 25.7% in Shrub oak.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Moorhead and Shrub oak at 11.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Moorhead | Shrub oak |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (250) | 0.4% (13) |
| High School Diploma | 10.0% (4,508) | 11.0% (330) |
| Less than High School | 6.0% (2,686) | 12.9% (387) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.9% (10,291) | 38.9% (1,168) |
Education Levels Comparison: Moorhead vs Shrub oak
- A higher percentage of residents in Moorhead have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Shrub oak.
- In Shrub oak, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Moorhead.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Shrub oak at 12.9%, compared to 6.0% in Moorhead.
- In Shrub oak, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 22.9% in Moorhead.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.