Demographics details for Moorhead, MN vs Oak harbor, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Moorhead, MN vs Oak harbor, WA.
| Data | Moorhead | Oak harbor |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 44,861 | 24,403 |
| Median Age | 31.0 years | 31.7 years |
| Median Income | $68,680 | $68,039 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Moorhead vs Oak harbor
- In Moorhead, the population is higher at 44,861, compared to 24,403 in Oak harbor.
- The median age in Oak harbor is higher at 31.7 years, compared to 31.0 years in Moorhead.
- Moorhead has a higher median income of $68,680 compared to $68,039 in Oak harbor.
- In Oak harbor, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 33.0% in Moorhead.
- Moorhead has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 7% in Oak harbor.
- Oak harbor has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.0% in Moorhead.
Demographics
Demographics Moorhead vs Oak harbor provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Moorhead | Oak harbor |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 5 |
| White | 81 | 56 |
| Asian | 2 | 8 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 14 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Moorhead vs Oak harbor
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Moorhead at 6% compared to 5% in Oak harbor.
- Moorhead has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 56% in Oak harbor.
- In Oak harbor, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 2% in Moorhead.
- Oak harbor has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 5% in Moorhead.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Oak harbor at 14%, compared to 5% in Moorhead.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Moorhead and Oak harbor at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Moorhead | Oak harbor |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 17.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 26.5% | 25.0% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 15.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.0% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 35.6% | 31.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Moorhead vs Oak harbor
- In Oak harbor, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 15.6% in Moorhead.
- Depression is more prevalent in Moorhead at 26.5% compared to 25.0% in Oak harbor.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Moorhead at 17.2% compared to 15.1% in Oak harbor.
- Binge drinking is more common in Moorhead at 19.0% compared to 16.2% in Oak harbor.
- Obesity rates are higher in Moorhead at 35.6% compared to 31.5% in Oak harbor.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Oak harbor at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Moorhead.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Moorhead | Oak harbor |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (250) | 0.4% (106) |
| High School Diploma | 10.0% (4,508) | 12.8% (3,133) |
| Less than High School | 6.0% (2,686) | 5.7% (1,395) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.9% (10,291) | 17.6% (4,288) |
Education Levels Comparison: Moorhead vs Oak harbor
- A higher percentage of residents in Moorhead have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Oak harbor.
- In Oak harbor, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.8% compared to 10.0% in Moorhead.
- More residents in Moorhead have less than a high school education at 6.0% compared to 5.7% in Oak harbor.
- A higher percentage of residents in Moorhead hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.9% compared to 17.6% in Oak harbor.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.