Demographics details for Moorhead, MN vs Carrollton, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Moorhead, MN vs Carrollton, GA.
Data | Moorhead | Carrollton |
---|---|---|
Population | 44,861 | 27,262 |
Median Age | 31.0 years | 27.5 years |
Median Income | $68,680 | $46,722 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 27.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Moorhead vs Carrollton
- In Moorhead, the population is higher at 44,861, compared to 27,262 in Carrollton.
- Residents in Moorhead have a higher median age of 31.0 years compared to 27.5 years in Carrollton.
- Moorhead has a higher median income of $68,680 compared to $46,722 in Carrollton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Moorhead at 33.0% compared to 27.0% in Carrollton.
- The poverty level is higher in Carrollton at 15%, compared to 9% in Moorhead.
- Carrollton has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 3.0% in Moorhead.
Demographics
Demographics Moorhead vs Carrollton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Moorhead | Carrollton |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 36 |
White | 81 | 47 |
Asian | 2 | 1 |
Hispanic | 5 | 9 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Moorhead vs Carrollton
- In Carrollton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 36% compared to 6% in Moorhead.
- Moorhead has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 47% in Carrollton.
- The Asian population is larger in Moorhead at 2% compared to 1% in Carrollton.
- Carrollton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 5% in Moorhead.
- Both Moorhead and Carrollton have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- In Carrollton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Moorhead.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Moorhead | Carrollton |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 18.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 13.8% |
Depression | 26.5% | 20.9% |
Smoking | 17.2% | 19.2% |
Binge Drinking | 19.0% | 14.7% |
Obesity | 35.6% | 37.8% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Moorhead vs Carrollton
- In Carrollton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 15.6% in Moorhead.
- Depression is more prevalent in Moorhead at 26.5% compared to 20.9% in Carrollton.
- Carrollton has a higher smoking rate at 19.2% compared to 17.2% in Moorhead.
- Binge drinking is more common in Moorhead at 19.0% compared to 14.7% in Carrollton.
- Carrollton has higher obesity rates at 37.8% compared to 35.6% in Moorhead.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Carrollton at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Moorhead.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Moorhead | Carrollton |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (250) | 0.8% (212) |
High School Diploma | 10.0% (4,508) | 12.6% (3,426) |
Less than High School | 6.0% (2,686) | 11.5% (3,126) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.9% (10,291) | 16.9% (4,617) |
Education Levels Comparison: Moorhead vs Carrollton
- In Carrollton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.6% in Moorhead.
- In Carrollton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.6% compared to 10.0% in Moorhead.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Carrollton at 11.5%, compared to 6.0% in Moorhead.
- A higher percentage of residents in Moorhead hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.9% compared to 16.9% in Carrollton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.