Demographics details for Moore, OK vs Baldwin park, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Moore, OK vs Baldwin park, CA.
| Data | Moore | Baldwin park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 63,223 | 69,455 |
| Median Age | 33.8 years | 37.1 years |
| Median Income | $73,285 | $76,002 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 6.3 |
Population Comparison: Moore vs Baldwin park
- The population in Baldwin park is higher at 69,455, compared to 63,223 in Moore.
- The median age in Baldwin park is higher at 37.1 years, compared to 33.8 years in Moore.
- Baldwin park has a higher median income of $76,002, compared to $73,285 in Moore.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Moore at 40.0% compared to 37.0% in Baldwin park.
- The poverty level is higher in Baldwin park at 12%, compared to 11% in Moore.
- Baldwin park has a higher unemployment rate at 6.3% compared to 3.1% in Moore.
Demographics
Demographics Moore vs Baldwin park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Moore | Baldwin park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 1 |
| White | 66 | -25 |
| Asian | 3 | 23 |
| Hispanic | 11 | 75 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 23 |
| American Indian | 4 | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Moore vs Baldwin park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Moore at 5% compared to 1% in Baldwin park.
- Moore has a higher percentage of White residents at 66% compared to -25% in Baldwin park.
- In Baldwin park, the Asian population stands at 23%, greater than 3% in Moore.
- Baldwin park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 75%, compared to 11% in Moore.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Baldwin park at 23%, compared to 11% in Moore.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Moore at 4% compared to 3% in Baldwin park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Moore | Baldwin park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 25.5% | 14.7% |
| Smoking | 16.7% | 11.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 14.2% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 29.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Moore vs Baldwin park
- More residents in Moore report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 15.4% in Baldwin park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Moore at 25.5% compared to 14.7% in Baldwin park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Moore at 16.7% compared to 11.4% in Baldwin park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Moore at 16.2% compared to 14.2% in Baldwin park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Moore at 34.4% compared to 29.9% in Baldwin park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Moore at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Baldwin park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Moore | Baldwin park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (694) | 5.5% (3,853) |
| High School Diploma | 15.4% (9,764) | 18.1% (12,587) |
| Less than High School | 10.6% (6,721) | 41.7% (28,939) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.6% (11,158) | 9.8% (6,787) |
Education Levels Comparison: Moore vs Baldwin park
- In Baldwin park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 5.5% compared to 1.1% in Moore.
- In Baldwin park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.1% compared to 15.4% in Moore.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Baldwin park at 41.7%, compared to 10.6% in Moore.
- A higher percentage of residents in Moore hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.6% compared to 9.8% in Baldwin park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.