Demographics details for Montrose, MI vs Santa fe springs, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Montrose, MI vs Santa fe springs, CA.

Data Montrose Santa fe springs
Population 1,712 18,439
Median Age 32.5 years 38.0 years
Median Income $41,750 $81,500
Married Families 33.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 15% 10%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 5.5

Population Comparison: Montrose vs Santa fe springs

  • The population in Santa fe springs is higher at 18,439, compared to 1,712 in Montrose.
  • The median age in Santa fe springs is higher at 38.0 years, compared to 32.5 years in Montrose.
  • Santa fe springs has a higher median income of $81,500, compared to $41,750 in Montrose.
  • In Santa fe springs, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 33.0% in Montrose.
  • Montrose has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Santa fe springs.
  • Santa fe springs has a higher unemployment rate at 5.5% compared to 5.0% in Montrose.

Demographics

Demographics Montrose vs Santa fe springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Montrose Santa fe springs
Black 6 4
White 77 -5
Asian Data is updating 8
Hispanic 7 75
Two or More Races 9 15
American Indian 1 3

Demographics Comparison: Montrose vs Santa fe springs

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Montrose at 6% compared to 4% in Santa fe springs.
  • Montrose has a higher percentage of White residents at 77% compared to -5% in Santa fe springs.
  • In Santa fe springs, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 0% in Montrose.
  • Santa fe springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 75%, compared to 7% in Montrose.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Santa fe springs at 15%, compared to 9% in Montrose.
  • In Santa fe springs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 1% in Montrose.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Montrose Santa fe springs
Mental Health Not Good 19.3% 14.9%
Physical Health Not Good 14.0% 11.7%
Depression 29.0% 15.1%
Smoking 24.2% 10.0%
Binge Drinking 18.0% 15.7%
Obesity 41.8% 30.9%
Disability Percentage 26.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Montrose vs Santa fe springs

  • More residents in Montrose report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 14.9% in Santa fe springs.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Montrose at 29.0% compared to 15.1% in Santa fe springs.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Montrose at 24.2% compared to 10.0% in Santa fe springs.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Montrose at 18.0% compared to 15.7% in Santa fe springs.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Montrose at 41.8% compared to 30.9% in Santa fe springs.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Montrose at 26.0% compared to 10.0% in Santa fe springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Montrose Santa fe springs
No Schooling 2.0% (34) 3.5% (644)
High School Diploma 22.7% (388) 16.3% (3,011)
Less than High School 17.2% (295) 26.5% (4,883)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 6.8% (117) 15.5% (2,850)

Education Levels Comparison: Montrose vs Santa fe springs

  • In Santa fe springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.5% compared to 2.0% in Montrose.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Montrose hold a high school diploma at 22.7% compared to 16.3% in Santa fe springs.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Santa fe springs at 26.5%, compared to 17.2% in Montrose.
  • In Santa fe springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.5% compared to 6.8% in Montrose.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.