Demographics details for Montour, IA vs Burkburnett, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Montour, IA vs Burkburnett, TX.
Data | Montour | Burkburnett |
---|---|---|
Population | 199 | 11,102 |
Median Age | 49.8 years | 42.5 years |
Median Income | $73,750 | $62,143 |
Married Families | 55.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Montour vs Burkburnett
- The population in Burkburnett is higher at 11,102, compared to 199 in Montour.
- Residents in Montour have a higher median age of 49.8 years compared to 42.5 years in Burkburnett.
- Montour has a higher median income of $73,750 compared to $62,143 in Burkburnett.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Montour at 55.0% compared to 44.0% in Burkburnett.
- The poverty level is higher in Burkburnett at 10%, compared to 5% in Montour.
- Burkburnett has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.1% in Montour.
Demographics
Demographics Montour vs Burkburnett provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Montour | Burkburnett |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 2 |
White | 76 | 73 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 11 | 16 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 8 |
American Indian | 3 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Montour vs Burkburnett
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Montour at 4% compared to 2% in Burkburnett.
- Montour has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 73% in Burkburnett.
- Both Montour and Burkburnett have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Burkburnett has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 11% in Montour.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Burkburnett at 8%, compared to 6% in Montour.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Montour at 3% compared to 1% in Burkburnett.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Montour | Burkburnett |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 18.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 11.6% |
Depression | 19.5% | 26.3% |
Smoking | 19.8% | 18.0% |
Binge Drinking | 21.3% | 19.7% |
Obesity | 42.6% | 35.0% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Montour vs Burkburnett
- In Burkburnett, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 16.5% in Montour.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Burkburnett at 26.3% versus 19.5% in Montour.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Montour at 19.8% compared to 18.0% in Burkburnett.
- Binge drinking is more common in Montour at 21.3% compared to 19.7% in Burkburnett.
- Obesity rates are higher in Montour at 42.6% compared to 35.0% in Burkburnett.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Burkburnett at 20.0% compared to 14.0% in Montour.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Montour | Burkburnett |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.6% (182) |
High School Diploma | 29.1% (58) | 19.6% (2,172) |
Less than High School | 25.1% (50) | 13.9% (1,543) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.6% (31) | 14.6% (1,618) |
Education Levels Comparison: Montour vs Burkburnett
- In Burkburnett, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.0% in Montour.
- A higher percentage of residents in Montour hold a high school diploma at 29.1% compared to 19.6% in Burkburnett.
- More residents in Montour have less than a high school education at 25.1% compared to 13.9% in Burkburnett.
- A higher percentage of residents in Montour hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.6% compared to 14.6% in Burkburnett.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.