Demographics details for Monticello, UT vs Cherokee, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Monticello, UT vs Cherokee, OK.
| Data | Monticello | Cherokee |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,752 | 48,098 |
| Median Age | 29.9 years | 36.5 years |
| Median Income | $71,833 | $52,410 |
| Married Families | 66.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Monticello vs Cherokee
- The population in Cherokee is higher at 48,098, compared to 1,752 in Monticello.
- The median age in Cherokee is higher at 36.5 years, compared to 29.9 years in Monticello.
- Monticello has a higher median income of $71,833 compared to $52,410 in Cherokee.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Monticello at 66.0% compared to 38.0% in Cherokee.
- The poverty level is higher in Cherokee at 15%, compared to 6% in Monticello.
- Cherokee has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 2.5% in Monticello.
Demographics
Demographics Monticello vs Cherokee provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Monticello | Cherokee |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | 78 | 42 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 13 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 15 |
| American Indian | 5 | 33 |
Demographics Comparison: Monticello vs Cherokee
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Monticello and Cherokee at 1%.
- Monticello has a higher percentage of White residents at 78% compared to 42% in Cherokee.
- In Cherokee, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Monticello.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Monticello at 13% compared to 8% in Cherokee.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cherokee at 15%, compared to 3% in Monticello.
- In Cherokee, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 33%, compared to 5% in Monticello.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Monticello | Cherokee |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 20.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 19.7% | 26.6% |
| Smoking | 9.8% | 23.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.8% | 13.8% |
| Obesity | 31.0% | 43.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Monticello vs Cherokee
- In Cherokee, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 15.5% in Monticello.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cherokee at 26.6% versus 19.7% in Monticello.
- Cherokee has a higher smoking rate at 23.2% compared to 9.8% in Monticello.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cherokee at 13.8% compared to 12.8% in Monticello.
- Cherokee has higher obesity rates at 43.7% compared to 31.0% in Monticello.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cherokee at 19.0% compared to 15.0% in Monticello.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Monticello | Cherokee |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.9% (433) |
| High School Diploma | 24.0% (420) | 15.6% (7,526) |
| Less than High School | 3.1% (55) | 11.5% (5,552) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.6% (308) | 17.9% (8,612) |
Education Levels Comparison: Monticello vs Cherokee
- In Cherokee, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Monticello.
- A higher percentage of residents in Monticello hold a high school diploma at 24.0% compared to 15.6% in Cherokee.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cherokee at 11.5%, compared to 3.1% in Monticello.
- In Cherokee, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.9% compared to 17.6% in Monticello.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.