Demographics details for Montgomery, IL vs Union springs, AL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Montgomery, IL vs Union springs, AL.

Data Montgomery Union springs
Population 21,799 3,242
Median Age 31.7 years 28.1 years
Median Income $105,240 $24,921
Married Families 36.0% 17.0%
Poverty Level 5% 25%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.2

Population Comparison: Montgomery vs Union springs

  • In Montgomery, the population is higher at 21,799, compared to 3,242 in Union springs.
  • Residents in Montgomery have a higher median age of 31.7 years compared to 28.1 years in Union springs.
  • Montgomery has a higher median income of $105,240 compared to $24,921 in Union springs.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Montgomery at 36.0% compared to 17.0% in Union springs.
  • The poverty level is higher in Union springs at 25%, compared to 5% in Montgomery.
  • Union springs has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.5% in Montgomery.

Demographics

Demographics Montgomery vs Union springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Montgomery Union springs
Black 5 69
White 52 4
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 31 22
Two or More Races 11 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Montgomery vs Union springs

  • In Union springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 69% compared to 5% in Montgomery.
  • Montgomery has a higher percentage of White residents at 52% compared to 4% in Union springs.
  • Both Montgomery and Union springs have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Montgomery at 31% compared to 22% in Union springs.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Montgomery at 11% compared to 4% in Union springs.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Montgomery and Union springs at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Montgomery Union springs
Mental Health Not Good 14.6% 21.3%
Physical Health Not Good 10.3% 16.9%
Depression 18.8% 20.8%
Smoking 14.1% 25.5%
Binge Drinking 17.3% 11.1%
Obesity 34.4% 49.5%
Disability Percentage 4.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Montgomery vs Union springs

  • In Union springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 14.6% in Montgomery.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Union springs at 20.8% versus 18.8% in Montgomery.
  • Union springs has a higher smoking rate at 25.5% compared to 14.1% in Montgomery.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Montgomery at 17.3% compared to 11.1% in Union springs.
  • Union springs has higher obesity rates at 49.5% compared to 34.4% in Montgomery.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Union springs at 15.0% compared to 4.0% in Montgomery.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Montgomery Union springs
No Schooling 1.2% (255) 3.6% (117)
High School Diploma 15.6% (3,406) 15.1% (489)
Less than High School 8.2% (1,792) 33.7% (1,092)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.5% (3,372) 7.3% (237)

Education Levels Comparison: Montgomery vs Union springs

  • In Union springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 1.2% in Montgomery.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Montgomery hold a high school diploma at 15.6% compared to 15.1% in Union springs.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Union springs at 33.7%, compared to 8.2% in Montgomery.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Montgomery hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.5% compared to 7.3% in Union springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.