Demographics details for Montgomery, IL vs Andrew, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Montgomery, IL vs Andrew, IA.
| Data | Montgomery | Andrew |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,799 | 378 |
| Median Age | 31.7 years | 39.8 years |
| Median Income | $105,240 | $61,613 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 51.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Montgomery vs Andrew
- In Montgomery, the population is higher at 21,799, compared to 378 in Andrew.
- The median age in Andrew is higher at 39.8 years, compared to 31.7 years in Montgomery.
- Montgomery has a higher median income of $105,240 compared to $61,613 in Andrew.
- In Andrew, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 36.0% in Montgomery.
- The poverty level is higher in Andrew at 9%, compared to 5% in Montgomery.
- The unemployment rate in Montgomery is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.5% in Andrew.
Demographics
Demographics Montgomery vs Andrew provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Montgomery | Andrew |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | Data is updating |
| White | 52 | 98 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 31 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Montgomery vs Andrew
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Montgomery at 5% compared to 0% in Andrew.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Andrew at 98% compared to 52% in Montgomery.
- The Asian population is larger in Montgomery at 1% compared to 0% in Andrew.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Montgomery at 31% compared to 1% in Andrew.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Montgomery at 11% compared to 1% in Andrew.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Montgomery and Andrew at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Montgomery | Andrew |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.6% | 15.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 9.4% |
| Depression | 18.8% | 18.3% |
| Smoking | 14.1% | 17.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 23.4% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 35.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 4.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Montgomery vs Andrew
- In Andrew, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 14.6% in Montgomery.
- Depression is more prevalent in Montgomery at 18.8% compared to 18.3% in Andrew.
- Andrew has a higher smoking rate at 17.4% compared to 14.1% in Montgomery.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Andrew at 23.4% compared to 17.3% in Montgomery.
- Andrew has higher obesity rates at 35.2% compared to 34.4% in Montgomery.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Andrew at 8.0% compared to 4.0% in Montgomery.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Montgomery | Andrew |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (255) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 15.6% (3,406) | 25.1% (95) |
| Less than High School | 8.2% (1,792) | 11.6% (44) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.5% (3,372) | 8.5% (32) |
Education Levels Comparison: Montgomery vs Andrew
- A higher percentage of residents in Montgomery have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Andrew.
- In Andrew, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.1% compared to 15.6% in Montgomery.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Andrew at 11.6%, compared to 8.2% in Montgomery.
- A higher percentage of residents in Montgomery hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.5% compared to 8.5% in Andrew.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.