Demographics details for Montgomery, AL vs Churdan, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Montgomery, AL vs Churdan, IA.
| Data | Montgomery | Churdan |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 196,986 | 363 |
| Median Age | 36.1 years | 28.8 years |
| Median Income | $54,166 | $58,125 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 49.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Montgomery vs Churdan
- In Montgomery, the population is higher at 196,986, compared to 363 in Churdan.
- Residents in Montgomery have a higher median age of 36.1 years compared to 28.8 years in Churdan.
- Churdan has a higher median income of $58,125, compared to $54,166 in Montgomery.
- In Churdan, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 28.0% in Montgomery.
- Montgomery has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Churdan.
- The unemployment rate in Montgomery is higher at 3.2%, compared to 3.0% in Churdan.
Demographics
Demographics Montgomery vs Churdan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Montgomery | Churdan |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 64 | 1 |
| White | 25 | 87 |
| Asian | 4 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Montgomery vs Churdan
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Montgomery at 64% compared to 1% in Churdan.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Churdan at 87% compared to 25% in Montgomery.
- The Asian population is larger in Montgomery at 4% compared to 3% in Churdan.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Montgomery at 4% compared to 2% in Churdan.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Churdan at 5%, compared to 3% in Montgomery.
- In Churdan, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Montgomery.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Montgomery | Churdan |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 16.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 20.2% | 19.7% |
| Smoking | 18.9% | 18.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 21.1% |
| Obesity | 38.4% | 36.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 25.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Montgomery vs Churdan
- More residents in Montgomery report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 16.2% in Churdan.
- Depression is more prevalent in Montgomery at 20.2% compared to 19.7% in Churdan.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Montgomery at 18.9% compared to 18.3% in Churdan.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Churdan at 21.1% compared to 14.2% in Montgomery.
- Obesity rates are higher in Montgomery at 38.4% compared to 36.4% in Churdan.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Churdan at 25.0% compared to 17.0% in Montgomery.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Montgomery | Churdan |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (1,627) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 14.0% (27,586) | 30.6% (111) |
| Less than High School | 10.0% (19,602) | 12.7% (46) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.1% (43,498) | 11.6% (42) |
Education Levels Comparison: Montgomery vs Churdan
- A higher percentage of residents in Montgomery have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Churdan.
- In Churdan, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.6% compared to 14.0% in Montgomery.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Churdan at 12.7%, compared to 10.0% in Montgomery.
- A higher percentage of residents in Montgomery hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.1% compared to 11.6% in Churdan.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.