Demographics details for Montezuma, GA vs Spokane valley, WA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Montezuma, GA vs Spokane valley, WA.

Data Montezuma Spokane valley
Population 2,958 107,325
Median Age 43.2 years 37.4 years
Median Income $46,315 $66,483
Married Families 26.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 19% 10%
Unemployment Rate 5.1 4.1

Population Comparison: Montezuma vs Spokane valley

  • The population in Spokane valley is higher at 107,325, compared to 2,958 in Montezuma.
  • Residents in Montezuma have a higher median age of 43.2 years compared to 37.4 years in Spokane valley.
  • Spokane valley has a higher median income of $66,483, compared to $46,315 in Montezuma.
  • In Spokane valley, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 26.0% in Montezuma.
  • Montezuma has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 10% in Spokane valley.
  • The unemployment rate in Montezuma is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.1% in Spokane valley.

Demographics

Demographics Montezuma vs Spokane valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Montezuma Spokane valley
Black 79 1
White 15 82
Asian 3 2
Hispanic 2 7
Two or More Races 1 7
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Montezuma vs Spokane valley

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Montezuma at 79% compared to 1% in Spokane valley.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Spokane valley at 82% compared to 15% in Montezuma.
  • The Asian population is larger in Montezuma at 3% compared to 2% in Spokane valley.
  • Spokane valley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 2% in Montezuma.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Spokane valley at 7%, compared to 1% in Montezuma.
  • In Spokane valley, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Montezuma.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Montezuma Spokane valley
Mental Health Not Good 19.8% 18.3%
Physical Health Not Good 15.7% 11.5%
Depression 19.7% 28.7%
Smoking 23.8% 15.3%
Binge Drinking 11.9% 18.5%
Obesity 44.2% 29.7%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Montezuma vs Spokane valley

  • More residents in Montezuma report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 18.3% in Spokane valley.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Spokane valley at 28.7% versus 19.7% in Montezuma.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Montezuma at 23.8% compared to 15.3% in Spokane valley.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Spokane valley at 18.5% compared to 11.9% in Montezuma.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Montezuma at 44.2% compared to 29.7% in Spokane valley.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Spokane valley at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Montezuma.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Montezuma Spokane valley
No Schooling 0.2% (7) 0.6% (596)
High School Diploma 24.9% (737) 15.6% (16,779)
Less than High School 11.3% (335) 7.2% (7,741)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.3% (333) 17.1% (18,346)

Education Levels Comparison: Montezuma vs Spokane valley

  • In Spokane valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.2% in Montezuma.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Montezuma hold a high school diploma at 24.9% compared to 15.6% in Spokane valley.
  • More residents in Montezuma have less than a high school education at 11.3% compared to 7.2% in Spokane valley.
  • In Spokane valley, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.1% compared to 11.3% in Montezuma.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.