Demographics details for Montezuma, GA vs Shunk, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Montezuma, GA vs Shunk, PA.
| Data | Montezuma | Shunk |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,958 | 88 |
| Median Age | 43.2 years | 45.0 years |
| Median Income | $46,315 | $60,000 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 55.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Montezuma vs Shunk
- In Montezuma, the population is higher at 2,958, compared to 88 in Shunk.
- The median age in Shunk is higher at 45.0 years, compared to 43.2 years in Montezuma.
- Shunk has a higher median income of $60,000, compared to $46,315 in Montezuma.
- In Shunk, the percentage of married families is higher at 55.0%, compared to 26.0% in Montezuma.
- Montezuma has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 10% in Shunk.
- The unemployment rate in Montezuma is higher at 5.1%, compared to 5.0% in Shunk.
Demographics
Demographics Montezuma vs Shunk provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Montezuma | Shunk |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 79 | Data is updating |
| White | 15 | 90 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Montezuma vs Shunk
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Montezuma at 79% compared to 0% in Shunk.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Shunk at 90% compared to 15% in Montezuma.
- The Asian population is larger in Montezuma at 3% compared to 0% in Shunk.
- Shunk has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 2% in Montezuma.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Shunk at 5%, compared to 1% in Montezuma.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Montezuma and Shunk at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Montezuma | Shunk |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.7% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 19.7% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 23.8% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.9% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 44.2% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Montezuma vs Shunk
- More residents in Montezuma report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 0.0% in Shunk.
- Depression is more prevalent in Montezuma at 19.7% compared to 0.0% in Shunk.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Montezuma at 23.8% compared to 0.0% in Shunk.
- Binge drinking is more common in Montezuma at 11.9% compared to 0.0% in Shunk.
- Obesity rates are higher in Montezuma at 44.2% compared to 0.0% in Shunk.
- Disability percentages are higher in Montezuma at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Shunk.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Montezuma | Shunk |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (7) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 24.9% (737) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 11.3% (335) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.3% (333) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Montezuma vs Shunk
- A higher percentage of residents in Montezuma have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Shunk.
- A higher percentage of residents in Montezuma hold a high school diploma at 24.9% compared to 0.0% in Shunk.
- More residents in Montezuma have less than a high school education at 11.3% compared to 0.0% in Shunk.
- A higher percentage of residents in Montezuma hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.3% compared to 0.0% in Shunk.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.