Demographics details for Montezuma, GA vs Palos park, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Montezuma, GA vs Palos park, IL.
| Data | Montezuma | Palos park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,958 | 4,792 |
| Median Age | 43.2 years | 59.5 years |
| Median Income | $46,315 | $128,370 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 60.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Montezuma vs Palos park
- The population in Palos park is higher at 4,792, compared to 2,958 in Montezuma.
- The median age in Palos park is higher at 59.5 years, compared to 43.2 years in Montezuma.
- Palos park has a higher median income of $128,370, compared to $46,315 in Montezuma.
- In Palos park, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 26.0% in Montezuma.
- Montezuma has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 0% in Palos park.
- The unemployment rate in Montezuma is higher at 5.1%, compared to 5.0% in Palos park.
Demographics
Demographics Montezuma vs Palos park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Montezuma | Palos park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 79 | 3 |
| White | 15 | 88 |
| Asian | 3 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Montezuma vs Palos park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Montezuma at 79% compared to 3% in Palos park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Palos park at 88% compared to 15% in Montezuma.
- The Asian population is larger in Montezuma at 3% compared to 1% in Palos park.
- Palos park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 2% in Montezuma.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Palos park at 5%, compared to 1% in Montezuma.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Montezuma and Palos park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Montezuma | Palos park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | 13.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.7% | 8.4% |
| Depression | 19.7% | 18.5% |
| Smoking | 23.8% | 11.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.9% | 20.8% |
| Obesity | 44.2% | 26.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Montezuma vs Palos park
- More residents in Montezuma report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 13.2% in Palos park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Montezuma at 19.7% compared to 18.5% in Palos park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Montezuma at 23.8% compared to 11.5% in Palos park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Palos park at 20.8% compared to 11.9% in Montezuma.
- Obesity rates are higher in Montezuma at 44.2% compared to 26.7% in Palos park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Montezuma at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Palos park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Montezuma | Palos park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (7) | 1.1% (54) |
| High School Diploma | 24.9% (737) | 18.2% (870) |
| Less than High School | 11.3% (335) | 6.0% (287) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.3% (333) | 42.1% (2,018) |
Education Levels Comparison: Montezuma vs Palos park
- In Palos park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.2% in Montezuma.
- A higher percentage of residents in Montezuma hold a high school diploma at 24.9% compared to 18.2% in Palos park.
- More residents in Montezuma have less than a high school education at 11.3% compared to 6.0% in Palos park.
- In Palos park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.1% compared to 11.3% in Montezuma.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.