Demographics details for Montezuma, GA vs Live oak, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Montezuma, GA vs Live oak, FL.
| Data | Montezuma | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,958 | 7,034 |
| Median Age | 43.2 years | 37.5 years |
| Median Income | $46,315 | $43,664 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Montezuma vs Live oak
- The population in Live oak is higher at 7,034, compared to 2,958 in Montezuma.
- Residents in Montezuma have a higher median age of 43.2 years compared to 37.5 years in Live oak.
- Montezuma has a higher median income of $46,315 compared to $43,664 in Live oak.
- In Live oak, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 26.0% in Montezuma.
- Montezuma has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 16% in Live oak.
- The unemployment rate in Montezuma is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.2% in Live oak.
Demographics
Demographics Montezuma vs Live oak provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Montezuma | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 79 | 38 |
| White | 15 | 41 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Montezuma vs Live oak
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Montezuma at 79% compared to 38% in Live oak.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Live oak at 41% compared to 15% in Montezuma.
- The Asian population is larger in Montezuma at 3% compared to 0% in Live oak.
- Live oak has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 2% in Montezuma.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Live oak at 12%, compared to 1% in Montezuma.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Montezuma and Live oak at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Montezuma | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.7% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 19.7% | 19.3% |
| Smoking | 23.8% | 22.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.9% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 44.2% | 37.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Montezuma vs Live oak
- More residents in Montezuma report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 17.0% in Live oak.
- Depression is more prevalent in Montezuma at 19.7% compared to 19.3% in Live oak.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Montezuma at 23.8% compared to 22.3% in Live oak.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Live oak at 14.9% compared to 11.9% in Montezuma.
- Obesity rates are higher in Montezuma at 44.2% compared to 37.1% in Live oak.
- Disability percentages are higher in Montezuma at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Live oak.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Montezuma | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (7) | 2.1% (147) |
| High School Diploma | 24.9% (737) | 25.0% (1,755) |
| Less than High School | 11.3% (335) | 11.3% (796) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.3% (333) | 7.7% (545) |
Education Levels Comparison: Montezuma vs Live oak
- In Live oak, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.2% in Montezuma.
- In Live oak, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.0% compared to 24.9% in Montezuma.
- Both cities report the same percentage of residents with less than a high school education at 11.3%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Montezuma hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.3% compared to 7.7% in Live oak.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.