Demographics details for Montezuma, GA vs Chapman, KS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Montezuma, GA vs Chapman, KS.

Data Montezuma Chapman
Population 2,958 1,371
Median Age 43.2 years 41.4 years
Median Income $46,315 $66,964
Married Families 26.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 19% 8%
Unemployment Rate 5.1 3.1

Population Comparison: Montezuma vs Chapman

  • In Montezuma, the population is higher at 2,958, compared to 1,371 in Chapman.
  • Residents in Montezuma have a higher median age of 43.2 years compared to 41.4 years in Chapman.
  • Chapman has a higher median income of $66,964, compared to $46,315 in Montezuma.
  • In Chapman, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 26.0% in Montezuma.
  • Montezuma has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 8% in Chapman.
  • The unemployment rate in Montezuma is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.1% in Chapman.

Demographics

Demographics Montezuma vs Chapman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Montezuma Chapman
Black 79 Data is updating
White 15 81
Asian 3 3
Hispanic 2 7
Two or More Races 1 7
American Indian Data is updating 2

Demographics Comparison: Montezuma vs Chapman

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Montezuma at 79% compared to 0% in Chapman.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Chapman at 81% compared to 15% in Montezuma.
  • Both Montezuma and Chapman have the same percentage of Asian residents at 3%.
  • Chapman has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 2% in Montezuma.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chapman at 7%, compared to 1% in Montezuma.
  • In Chapman, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Montezuma.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Montezuma Chapman
Mental Health Not Good 19.8% 15.7%
Physical Health Not Good 15.7% 9.5%
Depression 19.7% 21.4%
Smoking 23.8% 16.6%
Binge Drinking 11.9% 20.2%
Obesity 44.2% 37.3%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Montezuma vs Chapman

  • More residents in Montezuma report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 15.7% in Chapman.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Chapman at 21.4% versus 19.7% in Montezuma.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Montezuma at 23.8% compared to 16.6% in Chapman.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Chapman at 20.2% compared to 11.9% in Montezuma.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Montezuma at 44.2% compared to 37.3% in Chapman.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Montezuma at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Chapman.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Montezuma Chapman
No Schooling 0.2% (7) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 24.9% (737) 12.3% (168)
Less than High School 11.3% (335) 5.1% (70)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.3% (333) 15.5% (212)

Education Levels Comparison: Montezuma vs Chapman

  • A higher percentage of residents in Montezuma have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Chapman.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Montezuma hold a high school diploma at 24.9% compared to 12.3% in Chapman.
  • More residents in Montezuma have less than a high school education at 11.3% compared to 5.1% in Chapman.
  • In Chapman, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.5% compared to 11.3% in Montezuma.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.