Demographics details for Montezuma, GA vs Chandler, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Montezuma, GA vs Chandler, OK.
| Data | Montezuma | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,958 | 2,895 |
| Median Age | 43.2 years | 40.5 years |
| Median Income | $46,315 | $48,168 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Montezuma vs Chandler
- In Montezuma, the population is higher at 2,958, compared to 2,895 in Chandler.
- Residents in Montezuma have a higher median age of 43.2 years compared to 40.5 years in Chandler.
- Chandler has a higher median income of $48,168, compared to $46,315 in Montezuma.
- In Chandler, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 26.0% in Montezuma.
- Montezuma has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 13% in Chandler.
- The unemployment rate in Montezuma is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.5% in Chandler.
Demographics
Demographics Montezuma vs Chandler provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Montezuma | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 79 | 9 |
| White | 15 | 72 |
| Asian | 3 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Montezuma vs Chandler
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Montezuma at 79% compared to 9% in Chandler.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chandler at 72% compared to 15% in Montezuma.
- The Asian population is larger in Montezuma at 3% compared to 2% in Chandler.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Montezuma at 2% compared to 1% in Chandler.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chandler at 13%, compared to 1% in Montezuma.
- In Chandler, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Montezuma.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Montezuma | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.7% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 19.7% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 23.8% | 20.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.9% | 14.6% |
| Obesity | 44.2% | 41.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Montezuma vs Chandler
- More residents in Montezuma report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 18.4% in Chandler.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chandler at 24.6% versus 19.7% in Montezuma.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Montezuma at 23.8% compared to 20.3% in Chandler.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chandler at 14.6% compared to 11.9% in Montezuma.
- Obesity rates are higher in Montezuma at 44.2% compared to 41.1% in Chandler.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chandler at 18.0% compared to 15.0% in Montezuma.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Montezuma | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (7) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 24.9% (737) | 23.9% (691) |
| Less than High School | 11.3% (335) | 12.8% (372) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.3% (333) | 16.2% (469) |
Education Levels Comparison: Montezuma vs Chandler
- A higher percentage of residents in Montezuma have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Chandler.
- A higher percentage of residents in Montezuma hold a high school diploma at 24.9% compared to 23.9% in Chandler.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chandler at 12.8%, compared to 11.3% in Montezuma.
- In Chandler, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 11.3% in Montezuma.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.