Demographics details for Monrovia, MD vs Alamo, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Monrovia, MD vs Alamo, TN.
| Data | Monrovia | Alamo |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,980 | 2,317 |
| Median Age | 38.9 years | 34.9 years |
| Median Income | $224,886 | $50,135 |
| Married Families | 59.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 2% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Monrovia vs Alamo
- In Monrovia, the population is higher at 2,980, compared to 2,317 in Alamo.
- Residents in Monrovia have a higher median age of 38.9 years compared to 34.9 years in Alamo.
- Monrovia has a higher median income of $224,886 compared to $50,135 in Alamo.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Monrovia at 59.0% compared to 44.0% in Alamo.
- The poverty level is higher in Alamo at 14%, compared to 2% in Monrovia.
- Alamo has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.0% in Monrovia.
Demographics
Demographics Monrovia vs Alamo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Monrovia | Alamo |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 26 | 9 |
| White | 37 | 54 |
| Asian | 25 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 19 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 17 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Monrovia vs Alamo
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Monrovia at 26% compared to 9% in Alamo.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Alamo at 54% compared to 37% in Monrovia.
- The Asian population is larger in Monrovia at 25% compared to 1% in Alamo.
- Alamo has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 4% in Monrovia.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Alamo at 17%, compared to 8% in Monrovia.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Monrovia and Alamo at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Monrovia | Alamo |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.9% | 21.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.3% | 15.7% |
| Depression | 19.6% | 29.6% |
| Smoking | 11.2% | 25.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 14.1% |
| Obesity | 31.3% | 38.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 3.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Monrovia vs Alamo
- In Alamo, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 13.9% in Monrovia.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Alamo at 29.6% versus 19.6% in Monrovia.
- Alamo has a higher smoking rate at 25.9% compared to 11.2% in Monrovia.
- Binge drinking is more common in Monrovia at 18.3% compared to 14.1% in Alamo.
- Alamo has higher obesity rates at 38.9% compared to 31.3% in Monrovia.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Alamo at 16.0% compared to 3.0% in Monrovia.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Monrovia | Alamo |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (18) | 1.1% (25) |
| High School Diploma | 5.9% (177) | 24.9% (577) |
| Less than High School | 2.0% (60) | 26.1% (604) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 42.0% (1,253) | 7.9% (183) |
Education Levels Comparison: Monrovia vs Alamo
- In Alamo, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.6% in Monrovia.
- In Alamo, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.9% compared to 5.9% in Monrovia.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Alamo at 26.1%, compared to 2.0% in Monrovia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Monrovia hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.0% compared to 7.9% in Alamo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.