Demographics details for Monroeville, AL vs Klamath falls, OR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Monroeville, AL vs Klamath falls, OR.

Data Monroeville Klamath falls
Population 5,790 21,977
Median Age 43.3 years 35.1 years
Median Income $32,040 $46,695
Married Families 29.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level 20% 18%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 5.2

Population Comparison: Monroeville vs Klamath falls

  • The population in Klamath falls is higher at 21,977, compared to 5,790 in Monroeville.
  • Residents in Monroeville have a higher median age of 43.3 years compared to 35.1 years in Klamath falls.
  • Klamath falls has a higher median income of $46,695, compared to $32,040 in Monroeville.
  • In Klamath falls, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 29.0% in Monroeville.
  • Monroeville has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 18% in Klamath falls.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Monroeville and Klamath falls at 5.2%.

Demographics

Demographics Monroeville vs Klamath falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Monroeville Klamath falls
Black 67 1
White 29 69
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic Data is updating 15
Two or More Races 4 11
American Indian Data is updating 3

Demographics Comparison: Monroeville vs Klamath falls

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Monroeville at 67% compared to 1% in Klamath falls.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Klamath falls at 69% compared to 29% in Monroeville.
  • In Klamath falls, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Monroeville.
  • Klamath falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 0% in Monroeville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Klamath falls at 11%, compared to 4% in Monroeville.
  • In Klamath falls, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Monroeville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Monroeville Klamath falls
Mental Health Not Good 20.2% 20.2%
Physical Health Not Good 14.3% 13.4%
Depression 21.1% 28.4%
Smoking 22.0% 19.9%
Binge Drinking 13.2% 15.8%
Obesity 45.0% 35.9%
Disability Percentage 21.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Monroeville vs Klamath falls

  • Poor mental health levels are equal in both Monroeville and Klamath falls at 20.2%.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Klamath falls at 28.4% versus 21.1% in Monroeville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Monroeville at 22.0% compared to 19.9% in Klamath falls.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Klamath falls at 15.8% compared to 13.2% in Monroeville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Monroeville at 45.0% compared to 35.9% in Klamath falls.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Monroeville at 21.0% compared to 20.0% in Klamath falls.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Monroeville Klamath falls
No Schooling 0.2% (12) 0.9% (192)
High School Diploma 24.5% (1,418) 16.0% (3,508)
Less than High School 13.6% (788) 15.5% (3,401)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.5% (895) 14.4% (3,175)

Education Levels Comparison: Monroeville vs Klamath falls

  • In Klamath falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.2% in Monroeville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Monroeville hold a high school diploma at 24.5% compared to 16.0% in Klamath falls.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Klamath falls at 15.5%, compared to 13.6% in Monroeville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Monroeville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.5% compared to 14.4% in Klamath falls.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.