Demographics details for Monroeville, AL vs Fremont, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Monroeville, AL vs Fremont, OH.
Data | Monroeville | Fremont |
---|---|---|
Population | 5,790 | 15,825 |
Median Age | 43.3 years | 35.7 years |
Median Income | $32,040 | $48,252 |
Married Families | 29.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | 20% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Monroeville vs Fremont
- The population in Fremont is higher at 15,825, compared to 5,790 in Monroeville.
- Residents in Monroeville have a higher median age of 43.3 years compared to 35.7 years in Fremont.
- Fremont has a higher median income of $48,252, compared to $32,040 in Monroeville.
- In Fremont, the percentage of married families is higher at 30.0%, compared to 29.0% in Monroeville.
- Monroeville has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 14% in Fremont.
- The unemployment rate in Monroeville is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.0% in Fremont.
Demographics
Demographics Monroeville vs Fremont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Monroeville | Fremont |
---|---|---|
Black | 67 | 9 |
White | 29 | 68 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 15 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Monroeville vs Fremont
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Monroeville at 67% compared to 9% in Fremont.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fremont at 68% compared to 29% in Monroeville.
- Both Monroeville and Fremont have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Fremont has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 0% in Monroeville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fremont at 8%, compared to 4% in Monroeville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Monroeville and Fremont at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Monroeville | Fremont |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.2% | 18.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.3% | 13.2% |
Depression | 21.1% | 22.5% |
Smoking | 22.0% | 22.9% |
Binge Drinking | 13.2% | 17.4% |
Obesity | 45.0% | 44.3% |
Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Monroeville vs Fremont
- More residents in Monroeville report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 18.0% in Fremont.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fremont at 22.5% versus 21.1% in Monroeville.
- Fremont has a higher smoking rate at 22.9% compared to 22.0% in Monroeville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fremont at 17.4% compared to 13.2% in Monroeville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Monroeville at 45.0% compared to 44.3% in Fremont.
- Disability percentages are higher in Monroeville at 21.0% compared to 17.0% in Fremont.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Monroeville | Fremont |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (12) | 0.4% (57) |
High School Diploma | 24.5% (1,418) | 24.8% (3,931) |
Less than High School | 13.6% (788) | 10.0% (1,586) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.5% (895) | 10.4% (1,641) |
Education Levels Comparison: Monroeville vs Fremont
- In Fremont, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.2% in Monroeville.
- In Fremont, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.8% compared to 24.5% in Monroeville.
- More residents in Monroeville have less than a high school education at 13.6% compared to 10.0% in Fremont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Monroeville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.5% compared to 10.4% in Fremont.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.