Demographics details for Monroeville, AL vs Arvin, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Monroeville, AL vs Arvin, CA.
| Data | Monroeville | Arvin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,790 | 19,611 |
| Median Age | 43.3 years | 24.9 years |
| Median Income | $32,040 | $47,997 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 25% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 6.2 |
Population Comparison: Monroeville vs Arvin
- The population in Arvin is higher at 19,611, compared to 5,790 in Monroeville.
- Residents in Monroeville have a higher median age of 43.3 years compared to 24.9 years in Arvin.
- Arvin has a higher median income of $47,997, compared to $32,040 in Monroeville.
- In Arvin, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 29.0% in Monroeville.
- The poverty level is higher in Arvin at 25%, compared to 20% in Monroeville.
- Arvin has a higher unemployment rate at 6.2% compared to 5.2% in Monroeville.
Demographics
Demographics Monroeville vs Arvin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Monroeville | Arvin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 67 | 1 |
| White | 29 | -19 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 95 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 21 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Monroeville vs Arvin
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Monroeville at 67% compared to 1% in Arvin.
- Monroeville has a higher percentage of White residents at 29% compared to -19% in Arvin.
- In Arvin, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Monroeville.
- Arvin has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 95%, compared to 0% in Monroeville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Arvin at 21%, compared to 4% in Monroeville.
- In Arvin, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Monroeville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Monroeville | Arvin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.2% | 20.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.3% | 19.9% |
| Depression | 21.1% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 22.0% | 21.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.2% | 13.5% |
| Obesity | 45.0% | 42.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Monroeville vs Arvin
- In Arvin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 20.2% in Monroeville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Monroeville at 21.1% compared to 20.1% in Arvin.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Monroeville at 22.0% compared to 21.0% in Arvin.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Arvin at 13.5% compared to 13.2% in Monroeville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Monroeville at 45.0% compared to 42.4% in Arvin.
- Disability percentages are higher in Monroeville at 21.0% compared to 6.0% in Arvin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Monroeville | Arvin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (12) | 4.3% (840) |
| High School Diploma | 24.5% (1,418) | 11.8% (2,305) |
| Less than High School | 13.6% (788) | 53.7% (10,540) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.5% (895) | 2.0% (383) |
Education Levels Comparison: Monroeville vs Arvin
- In Arvin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.3% compared to 0.2% in Monroeville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Monroeville hold a high school diploma at 24.5% compared to 11.8% in Arvin.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Arvin at 53.7%, compared to 13.6% in Monroeville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Monroeville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.5% compared to 2.0% in Arvin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.