Demographics details for Monroe, NC vs Taylorsville, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Monroe, NC vs Taylorsville, UT.
| Data | Monroe | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 36,018 | 57,879 |
| Median Age | 36.1 years | 33.7 years |
| Median Income | $63,982 | $81,417 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Monroe vs Taylorsville
- The population in Taylorsville is higher at 57,879, compared to 36,018 in Monroe.
- Residents in Monroe have a higher median age of 36.1 years compared to 33.7 years in Taylorsville.
- Taylorsville has a higher median income of $81,417, compared to $63,982 in Monroe.
- In Taylorsville, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 36.0% in Monroe.
- Monroe has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 9% in Taylorsville.
- The unemployment rate in Monroe is higher at 3.9%, compared to 3.6% in Taylorsville.
Demographics
Demographics Monroe vs Taylorsville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Monroe | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 22 | 1 |
| White | 41 | 57 |
| Asian | 1 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 27 | 25 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Monroe vs Taylorsville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Monroe at 22% compared to 1% in Taylorsville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Taylorsville at 57% compared to 41% in Monroe.
- In Taylorsville, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 1% in Monroe.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Monroe at 27% compared to 25% in Taylorsville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Taylorsville at 9%, compared to 8% in Monroe.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Monroe and Taylorsville at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Monroe | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 18.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.0% | 11.4% |
| Depression | 22.0% | 27.2% |
| Smoking | 19.0% | 10.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 15.2% |
| Obesity | 37.7% | 32.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Monroe vs Taylorsville
- In Taylorsville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 17.0% in Monroe.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Taylorsville at 27.2% versus 22.0% in Monroe.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Monroe at 19.0% compared to 10.0% in Taylorsville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Monroe at 15.8% compared to 15.2% in Taylorsville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Monroe at 37.7% compared to 32.0% in Taylorsville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Taylorsville at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Monroe.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Monroe | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (716) | 1.2% (721) |
| High School Diploma | 14.8% (5,322) | 16.9% (9,799) |
| Less than High School | 20.0% (7,220) | 15.2% (8,775) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.7% (4,559) | 15.7% (9,066) |
Education Levels Comparison: Monroe vs Taylorsville
- A higher percentage of residents in Monroe have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 1.2% in Taylorsville.
- In Taylorsville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.9% compared to 14.8% in Monroe.
- More residents in Monroe have less than a high school education at 20.0% compared to 15.2% in Taylorsville.
- In Taylorsville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.7% compared to 12.7% in Monroe.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.