Demographics details for Monroe, NC vs Livermore, ME
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Monroe, NC vs Livermore, ME.
| Data | Monroe | Livermore |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 36,018 | 2,120 |
| Median Age | 36.1 years | 45.0 years |
| Median Income | $63,982 | $55,000 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 60.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Monroe vs Livermore
- In Monroe, the population is higher at 36,018, compared to 2,120 in Livermore.
- The median age in Livermore is higher at 45.0 years, compared to 36.1 years in Monroe.
- Monroe has a higher median income of $63,982 compared to $55,000 in Livermore.
- In Livermore, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 36.0% in Monroe.
- The poverty level is higher in Livermore at 12%, compared to 11% in Monroe.
- The unemployment rate in Monroe is higher at 3.9%, compared to 3.3% in Livermore.
Demographics
Demographics Monroe vs Livermore provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Monroe | Livermore |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 22 | 1 |
| White | 41 | 97 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 27 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Monroe vs Livermore
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Monroe at 22% compared to 1% in Livermore.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Livermore at 97% compared to 41% in Monroe.
- Both Monroe and Livermore have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Monroe at 27% compared to 1% in Livermore.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Monroe at 8% compared to 0% in Livermore.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Monroe at 1% compared to 0% in Livermore.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Monroe | Livermore |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.0% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 22.0% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 19.0% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 37.7% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Monroe vs Livermore
- More residents in Monroe report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Livermore.
- Depression is more prevalent in Monroe at 22.0% compared to 0.0% in Livermore.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Monroe at 19.0% compared to 0.0% in Livermore.
- Binge drinking is more common in Monroe at 15.8% compared to 0.0% in Livermore.
- Obesity rates are higher in Monroe at 37.7% compared to 0.0% in Livermore.
- Disability percentages are higher in Monroe at 10.0% compared to 0.0% in Livermore.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Monroe | Livermore |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (716) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 14.8% (5,322) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 20.0% (7,220) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.7% (4,559) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Monroe vs Livermore
- A higher percentage of residents in Monroe have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.0% in Livermore.
- A higher percentage of residents in Monroe hold a high school diploma at 14.8% compared to 0.0% in Livermore.
- More residents in Monroe have less than a high school education at 20.0% compared to 0.0% in Livermore.
- A higher percentage of residents in Monroe hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.7% compared to 0.0% in Livermore.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.