Demographics details for Monroe, MI vs Stanardsville, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Monroe, MI vs Stanardsville, VA.
| Data | Monroe | Stanardsville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,295 | 355 |
| Median Age | 36.6 years | 42.2 years |
| Median Income | $57,779 | $60,833 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 54.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.8 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Monroe vs Stanardsville
- In Monroe, the population is higher at 20,295, compared to 355 in Stanardsville.
- The median age in Stanardsville is higher at 42.2 years, compared to 36.6 years in Monroe.
- Stanardsville has a higher median income of $60,833, compared to $57,779 in Monroe.
- In Stanardsville, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 33.0% in Monroe.
- Monroe has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Stanardsville.
- The unemployment rate in Monroe is higher at 5.8%, compared to 3.5% in Stanardsville.
Demographics
Demographics Monroe vs Stanardsville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Monroe | Stanardsville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 12 |
| White | 86 | 64 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Monroe vs Stanardsville
- In Stanardsville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 6% in Monroe.
- Monroe has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 64% in Stanardsville.
- The Asian population is larger in Monroe at 1% compared to 0% in Stanardsville.
- Stanardsville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 3% in Monroe.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Stanardsville at 13%, compared to 4% in Monroe.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Monroe and Stanardsville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Monroe | Stanardsville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 25.7% | 24.1% |
| Smoking | 21.6% | 18.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 43.7% | 36.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Monroe vs Stanardsville
- More residents in Monroe report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 18.0% in Stanardsville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Monroe at 25.7% compared to 24.1% in Stanardsville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Monroe at 21.6% compared to 18.5% in Stanardsville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Monroe at 17.5% compared to 16.5% in Stanardsville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Monroe at 43.7% compared to 36.7% in Stanardsville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Stanardsville at 23.0% compared to 16.0% in Monroe.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Monroe | Stanardsville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (105) | 8.7% (31) |
| High School Diploma | 17.0% (3,449) | 27.9% (99) |
| Less than High School | 13.0% (2,633) | 28.7% (102) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.2% (2,681) | 27.6% (98) |
Education Levels Comparison: Monroe vs Stanardsville
- In Stanardsville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 8.7% compared to 0.5% in Monroe.
- In Stanardsville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.9% compared to 17.0% in Monroe.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Stanardsville at 28.7%, compared to 13.0% in Monroe.
- In Stanardsville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.6% compared to 13.2% in Monroe.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.