Demographics details for Monroe, MI vs Cole camp, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Monroe, MI vs Cole camp, MO.
Data | Monroe | Cole camp |
---|---|---|
Population | 20,295 | 1,149 |
Median Age | 36.6 years | 47.2 years |
Median Income | $57,779 | $40,192 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 48.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.8 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Monroe vs Cole camp
- In Monroe, the population is higher at 20,295, compared to 1,149 in Cole camp.
- The median age in Cole camp is higher at 47.2 years, compared to 36.6 years in Monroe.
- Monroe has a higher median income of $57,779 compared to $40,192 in Cole camp.
- In Cole camp, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 33.0% in Monroe.
- The poverty level is identical in both Monroe and Cole camp at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Monroe is higher at 5.8%, compared to 3.5% in Cole camp.
Demographics
Demographics Monroe vs Cole camp provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Monroe | Cole camp |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | Data is updating |
White | 86 | 100 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 3 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 4 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Monroe vs Cole camp
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Monroe at 6% compared to 0% in Cole camp.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cole camp at 100% compared to 86% in Monroe.
- The Asian population is larger in Monroe at 1% compared to 0% in Cole camp.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Monroe at 3% compared to 0% in Cole camp.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Monroe at 4% compared to 0% in Cole camp.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Monroe and Cole camp at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Monroe | Cole camp |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 19.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 13.7% |
Depression | 25.7% | 24.7% |
Smoking | 21.6% | 22.4% |
Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 16.6% |
Obesity | 43.7% | 42.4% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Monroe vs Cole camp
- More residents in Monroe report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 19.0% in Cole camp.
- Depression is more prevalent in Monroe at 25.7% compared to 24.7% in Cole camp.
- Cole camp has a higher smoking rate at 22.4% compared to 21.6% in Monroe.
- Binge drinking is more common in Monroe at 17.5% compared to 16.6% in Cole camp.
- Obesity rates are higher in Monroe at 43.7% compared to 42.4% in Cole camp.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cole camp at 19.0% compared to 16.0% in Monroe.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Monroe | Cole camp |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (105) | 0.4% (5) |
High School Diploma | 17.0% (3,449) | 31.4% (361) |
Less than High School | 13.0% (2,633) | 10.6% (122) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.2% (2,681) | 14.4% (166) |
Education Levels Comparison: Monroe vs Cole camp
- A higher percentage of residents in Monroe have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Cole camp.
- In Cole camp, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 31.4% compared to 17.0% in Monroe.
- More residents in Monroe have less than a high school education at 13.0% compared to 10.6% in Cole camp.
- In Cole camp, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 13.2% in Monroe.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.