Demographics details for Monroe, LA vs Woodbury, VT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Monroe, LA vs Woodbury, VT.
| Data | Monroe | Woodbury |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,820 | 887 |
| Median Age | 34.3 years | 46.0 years |
| Median Income | $36,550 | $75,000 |
| Married Families | 23.0% | 60.0% |
| Poverty Level | 24% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.9 | 2.0 |
Population Comparison: Monroe vs Woodbury
- In Monroe, the population is higher at 46,820, compared to 887 in Woodbury.
- The median age in Woodbury is higher at 46.0 years, compared to 34.3 years in Monroe.
- Woodbury has a higher median income of $75,000, compared to $36,550 in Monroe.
- In Woodbury, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 23.0% in Monroe.
- Monroe has a higher poverty level at 24% compared to 5% in Woodbury.
- The unemployment rate in Monroe is higher at 5.9%, compared to 2.0% in Woodbury.
Demographics
Demographics Monroe vs Woodbury provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Monroe | Woodbury |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 62 | Data is updating |
| White | 33 | 95 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Monroe vs Woodbury
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Monroe at 62% compared to 0% in Woodbury.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Woodbury at 95% compared to 33% in Monroe.
- The Asian population is larger in Monroe at 2% compared to 1% in Woodbury.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Monroe and Woodbury at 2%.
- Both Monroe and Woodbury have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 1%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Monroe and Woodbury at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Monroe | Woodbury |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.1% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.0% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 23.8% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 26.0% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.3% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 41.9% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Monroe vs Woodbury
- More residents in Monroe report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 0.0% in Woodbury.
- Depression is more prevalent in Monroe at 23.8% compared to 0.0% in Woodbury.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Monroe at 26.0% compared to 0.0% in Woodbury.
- Binge drinking is more common in Monroe at 14.3% compared to 0.0% in Woodbury.
- Obesity rates are higher in Monroe at 41.9% compared to 0.0% in Woodbury.
- Disability percentages are higher in Monroe at 13.0% compared to 0.0% in Woodbury.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Monroe | Woodbury |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (320) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 16.8% (7,877) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 10.9% (5,106) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.1% (8,014) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Monroe vs Woodbury
- A higher percentage of residents in Monroe have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Woodbury.
- A higher percentage of residents in Monroe hold a high school diploma at 16.8% compared to 0.0% in Woodbury.
- More residents in Monroe have less than a high school education at 10.9% compared to 0.0% in Woodbury.
- A higher percentage of residents in Monroe hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.1% compared to 0.0% in Woodbury.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.