Demographics details for Monroe, LA vs Weatherford, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Monroe, LA vs Weatherford, OK.
| Data | Monroe | Weatherford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,820 | 11,859 |
| Median Age | 34.3 years | 23.9 years |
| Median Income | $36,550 | $47,851 |
| Married Families | 23.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 24% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.9 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Monroe vs Weatherford
- In Monroe, the population is higher at 46,820, compared to 11,859 in Weatherford.
- Residents in Monroe have a higher median age of 34.3 years compared to 23.9 years in Weatherford.
- Weatherford has a higher median income of $47,851, compared to $36,550 in Monroe.
- In Weatherford, the percentage of married families is higher at 28.0%, compared to 23.0% in Monroe.
- Monroe has a higher poverty level at 24% compared to 15% in Weatherford.
- The unemployment rate in Monroe is higher at 5.9%, compared to 3.5% in Weatherford.
Demographics
Demographics Monroe vs Weatherford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Monroe | Weatherford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 62 | 3 |
| White | 33 | 66 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 14 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Monroe vs Weatherford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Monroe at 62% compared to 3% in Weatherford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Weatherford at 66% compared to 33% in Monroe.
- Both Monroe and Weatherford have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Weatherford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 2% in Monroe.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Weatherford at 11%, compared to 1% in Monroe.
- In Weatherford, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Monroe.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Monroe | Weatherford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.1% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.0% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 23.8% | 25.5% |
| Smoking | 26.0% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.3% | 14.4% |
| Obesity | 41.9% | 44.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Monroe vs Weatherford
- More residents in Monroe report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 18.6% in Weatherford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Weatherford at 25.5% versus 23.8% in Monroe.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Monroe at 26.0% compared to 18.6% in Weatherford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Weatherford at 14.4% compared to 14.3% in Monroe.
- Weatherford has higher obesity rates at 44.1% compared to 41.9% in Monroe.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Monroe and Weatherford at 13.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Monroe | Weatherford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (320) | 0.4% (48) |
| High School Diploma | 16.8% (7,877) | 9.1% (1,082) |
| Less than High School | 10.9% (5,106) | 5.2% (621) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.1% (8,014) | 18.9% (2,246) |
Education Levels Comparison: Monroe vs Weatherford
- A higher percentage of residents in Monroe have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Weatherford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Monroe hold a high school diploma at 16.8% compared to 9.1% in Weatherford.
- More residents in Monroe have less than a high school education at 10.9% compared to 5.2% in Weatherford.
- In Weatherford, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.9% compared to 17.1% in Monroe.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.