Demographics details for Monroe center, IL vs Sioux falls, SD

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Monroe center, IL vs Sioux falls, SD.

Data Monroe center Sioux falls
Population 410 202,078
Median Age 39.6 years 34.9 years
Median Income $86,375 $71,785
Married Families 56.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 5% 11%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 2.0

Population Comparison: Monroe center vs Sioux falls

  • The population in Sioux falls is higher at 202,078, compared to 410 in Monroe center.
  • Residents in Monroe center have a higher median age of 39.6 years compared to 34.9 years in Sioux falls.
  • Monroe center has a higher median income of $86,375 compared to $71,785 in Sioux falls.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Monroe center at 56.0% compared to 37.0% in Sioux falls.
  • The poverty level is higher in Sioux falls at 11%, compared to 5% in Monroe center.
  • The unemployment rate in Monroe center is higher at 4.5%, compared to 2.0% in Sioux falls.

Demographics

Demographics Monroe center vs Sioux falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Monroe center Sioux falls
Black Data is updating 7
White 96 78
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic 2 5
Two or More Races 2 6
American Indian Data is updating 2

Demographics Comparison: Monroe center vs Sioux falls

  • In Sioux falls, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 0% in Monroe center.
  • Monroe center has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 78% in Sioux falls.
  • In Sioux falls, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Monroe center.
  • Sioux falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 2% in Monroe center.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sioux falls at 6%, compared to 2% in Monroe center.
  • In Sioux falls, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Monroe center.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Monroe center Sioux falls
Mental Health Not Good 16.4% 13.3%
Physical Health Not Good 10.9% 8.8%
Depression 21.7% 19.4%
Smoking 17.3% 16.0%
Binge Drinking 18.7% 21.6%
Obesity 34.5% 35.8%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Monroe center vs Sioux falls

  • More residents in Monroe center report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 13.3% in Sioux falls.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Monroe center at 21.7% compared to 19.4% in Sioux falls.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Monroe center at 17.3% compared to 16.0% in Sioux falls.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Sioux falls at 21.6% compared to 18.7% in Monroe center.
  • Sioux falls has higher obesity rates at 35.8% compared to 34.5% in Monroe center.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Monroe center at 16.0% compared to 9.0% in Sioux falls.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Monroe center Sioux falls
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.8% (1,619)
High School Diploma 20.5% (84) 13.1% (26,548)
Less than High School 7.8% (32) 7.3% (14,743)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.1% (70) 23.3% (47,034)

Education Levels Comparison: Monroe center vs Sioux falls

  • In Sioux falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Monroe center.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Monroe center hold a high school diploma at 20.5% compared to 13.1% in Sioux falls.
  • More residents in Monroe center have less than a high school education at 7.8% compared to 7.3% in Sioux falls.
  • In Sioux falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.3% compared to 17.1% in Monroe center.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.