Demographics details for Mokelumne hill, CA vs Woodland, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mokelumne hill, CA vs Woodland, PA.

Data Mokelumne hill Woodland
Population 808 185
Median Age 61.8 years 36.0 years
Median Income $81,483 $55,000
Married Families 65.0% 30.0%
Poverty Level 10% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.0

Population Comparison: Mokelumne hill vs Woodland

  • In Mokelumne hill, the population is higher at 808, compared to 185 in Woodland.
  • Residents in Mokelumne hill have a higher median age of 61.8 years compared to 36.0 years in Woodland.
  • Mokelumne hill has a higher median income of $81,483 compared to $55,000 in Woodland.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Mokelumne hill at 65.0% compared to 30.0% in Woodland.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Mokelumne hill and Woodland at 10%.
  • Woodland has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.5% in Mokelumne hill.

Demographics

Demographics Mokelumne hill vs Woodland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mokelumne hill Woodland
Black 15 3
White 48 92
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic 24 1
Two or More Races 13 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Mokelumne hill vs Woodland

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mokelumne hill at 15% compared to 3% in Woodland.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Woodland at 92% compared to 48% in Mokelumne hill.
  • In Woodland, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Mokelumne hill.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Mokelumne hill at 24% compared to 1% in Woodland.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Mokelumne hill at 13% compared to 2% in Woodland.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mokelumne hill and Woodland at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mokelumne hill Woodland
Mental Health Not Good 19.8% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 13.6% Data is updating%
Depression 24.2% Data is updating%
Smoking 17.6% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 16.7% Data is updating%
Obesity 32.4% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 9.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mokelumne hill vs Woodland

  • More residents in Mokelumne hill report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 0.0% in Woodland.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Mokelumne hill at 24.2% compared to 0.0% in Woodland.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Mokelumne hill at 17.6% compared to 0.0% in Woodland.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Mokelumne hill at 16.7% compared to 0.0% in Woodland.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Mokelumne hill at 32.4% compared to 0.0% in Woodland.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Mokelumne hill at 9.0% compared to 0.0% in Woodland.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mokelumne hill Woodland
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 12.5% (101) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 8.7% (70) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 20.2% (163) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Mokelumne hill vs Woodland

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Mokelumne hill and Woodland at 0.0%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mokelumne hill hold a high school diploma at 12.5% compared to 0.0% in Woodland.
  • More residents in Mokelumne hill have less than a high school education at 8.7% compared to 0.0% in Woodland.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mokelumne hill hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.2% compared to 0.0% in Woodland.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.