Demographics details for Mokelumne hill, CA vs Lumberton, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mokelumne hill, CA vs Lumberton, NC.

Data Mokelumne hill Lumberton
Population 808 18,841
Median Age 61.8 years 37.2 years
Median Income $81,483 $41,314
Married Families 65.0% 25.0%
Poverty Level 10% 23%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 7.1

Population Comparison: Mokelumne hill vs Lumberton

  • The population in Lumberton is higher at 18,841, compared to 808 in Mokelumne hill.
  • Residents in Mokelumne hill have a higher median age of 61.8 years compared to 37.2 years in Lumberton.
  • Mokelumne hill has a higher median income of $81,483 compared to $41,314 in Lumberton.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Mokelumne hill at 65.0% compared to 25.0% in Lumberton.
  • The poverty level is higher in Lumberton at 23%, compared to 10% in Mokelumne hill.
  • Lumberton has a higher unemployment rate at 7.1% compared to 3.5% in Mokelumne hill.

Demographics

Demographics Mokelumne hill vs Lumberton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mokelumne hill Lumberton
Black 15 37
White 48 36
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 24 9
Two or More Races 13 4
American Indian Data is updating 13

Demographics Comparison: Mokelumne hill vs Lumberton

  • In Lumberton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 37% compared to 15% in Mokelumne hill.
  • Mokelumne hill has a higher percentage of White residents at 48% compared to 36% in Lumberton.
  • In Lumberton, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Mokelumne hill.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Mokelumne hill at 24% compared to 9% in Lumberton.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Mokelumne hill at 13% compared to 4% in Lumberton.
  • In Lumberton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 13%, compared to 0% in Mokelumne hill.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mokelumne hill Lumberton
Mental Health Not Good 19.8% 18.9%
Physical Health Not Good 13.6% 15.8%
Depression 24.2% 22.8%
Smoking 17.6% 25.2%
Binge Drinking 16.7% 13.9%
Obesity 32.4% 44.4%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mokelumne hill vs Lumberton

  • More residents in Mokelumne hill report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 18.9% in Lumberton.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Mokelumne hill at 24.2% compared to 22.8% in Lumberton.
  • Lumberton has a higher smoking rate at 25.2% compared to 17.6% in Mokelumne hill.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Mokelumne hill at 16.7% compared to 13.9% in Lumberton.
  • Lumberton has higher obesity rates at 44.4% compared to 32.4% in Mokelumne hill.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lumberton at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Mokelumne hill.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mokelumne hill Lumberton
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.9% (161)
High School Diploma 12.5% (101) 16.6% (3,130)
Less than High School 8.7% (70) 19.2% (3,624)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 20.2% (163) 14.5% (2,730)

Education Levels Comparison: Mokelumne hill vs Lumberton

  • In Lumberton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Mokelumne hill.
  • In Lumberton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.6% compared to 12.5% in Mokelumne hill.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lumberton at 19.2%, compared to 8.7% in Mokelumne hill.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mokelumne hill hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.2% compared to 14.5% in Lumberton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.