Demographics details for Mokelumne hill, CA vs Chickasha, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mokelumne hill, CA vs Chickasha, OK.
| Data | Mokelumne hill | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 808 | 16,549 |
| Median Age | 61.8 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $81,483 | $55,136 |
| Married Families | 65.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 17% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Mokelumne hill vs Chickasha
- The population in Chickasha is higher at 16,549, compared to 808 in Mokelumne hill.
- Residents in Mokelumne hill have a higher median age of 61.8 years compared to 36.4 years in Chickasha.
- Mokelumne hill has a higher median income of $81,483 compared to $55,136 in Chickasha.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mokelumne hill at 65.0% compared to 34.0% in Chickasha.
- The poverty level is higher in Chickasha at 17%, compared to 10% in Mokelumne hill.
- The unemployment rate in Mokelumne hill is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Chickasha.
Demographics
Demographics Mokelumne hill vs Chickasha provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mokelumne hill | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 6 |
| White | 48 | 71 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 24 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Mokelumne hill vs Chickasha
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mokelumne hill at 15% compared to 6% in Chickasha.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chickasha at 71% compared to 48% in Mokelumne hill.
- Both Mokelumne hill and Chickasha have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mokelumne hill at 24% compared to 8% in Chickasha.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mokelumne hill at 13% compared to 11% in Chickasha.
- In Chickasha, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Mokelumne hill.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mokelumne hill | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 13.7% |
| Depression | 24.2% | 25.4% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 21.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 13.8% |
| Obesity | 32.4% | 40.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mokelumne hill vs Chickasha
- More residents in Mokelumne hill report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 19.1% in Chickasha.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chickasha at 25.4% versus 24.2% in Mokelumne hill.
- Chickasha has a higher smoking rate at 21.8% compared to 17.6% in Mokelumne hill.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mokelumne hill at 16.7% compared to 13.8% in Chickasha.
- Chickasha has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 32.4% in Mokelumne hill.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chickasha at 18.0% compared to 9.0% in Mokelumne hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mokelumne hill | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.5% (78) |
| High School Diploma | 12.5% (101) | 22.5% (3,730) |
| Less than High School | 8.7% (70) | 13.1% (2,160) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.2% (163) | 12.5% (2,066) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mokelumne hill vs Chickasha
- In Chickasha, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Mokelumne hill.
- In Chickasha, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.5% compared to 12.5% in Mokelumne hill.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chickasha at 13.1%, compared to 8.7% in Mokelumne hill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mokelumne hill hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.2% compared to 12.5% in Chickasha.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.