Demographics details for Mobridge, SD vs Cedar hill, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mobridge, SD vs Cedar hill, TX.
Data | Mobridge | Cedar hill |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,228 | 48,341 |
Median Age | 42.4 years | 35.3 years |
Median Income | $54,868 | $84,132 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Mobridge vs Cedar hill
- The population in Cedar hill is higher at 48,341, compared to 3,228 in Mobridge.
- Residents in Mobridge have a higher median age of 42.4 years compared to 35.3 years in Cedar hill.
- Cedar hill has a higher median income of $84,132, compared to $54,868 in Mobridge.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mobridge at 39.0% compared to 38.0% in Cedar hill.
- Mobridge has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Cedar hill.
- Cedar hill has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.5% in Mobridge.
Demographics
Demographics Mobridge vs Cedar hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Mobridge | Cedar hill |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 51 |
White | 71 | 11 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 1 | 27 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 9 |
American Indian | 16 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mobridge vs Cedar hill
- In Cedar hill, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 51% compared to 3% in Mobridge.
- Mobridge has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 11% in Cedar hill.
- In Cedar hill, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Mobridge.
- Cedar hill has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 1% in Mobridge.
- Both Mobridge and Cedar hill have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 9%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Mobridge at 16% compared to 0% in Cedar hill.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Mobridge | Cedar hill |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.7% | 16.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 10.4% |
Depression | 16.9% | 20.5% |
Smoking | 18.0% | 14.8% |
Binge Drinking | 19.9% | 17.7% |
Obesity | 35.8% | 35.9% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mobridge vs Cedar hill
- In Cedar hill, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.1% compared to 13.7% in Mobridge.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cedar hill at 20.5% versus 16.9% in Mobridge.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mobridge at 18.0% compared to 14.8% in Cedar hill.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mobridge at 19.9% compared to 17.7% in Cedar hill.
- Cedar hill has higher obesity rates at 35.9% compared to 35.8% in Mobridge.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mobridge at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Cedar hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Mobridge | Cedar hill |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (37) | 1.2% (578) |
High School Diploma | 18.6% (599) | 13.4% (6,465) |
Less than High School | 6.9% (224) | 10.2% (4,909) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.1% (615) | 18.4% (8,890) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mobridge vs Cedar hill
- In Cedar hill, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 1.1% in Mobridge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mobridge hold a high school diploma at 18.6% compared to 13.4% in Cedar hill.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cedar hill at 10.2%, compared to 6.9% in Mobridge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mobridge hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.1% compared to 18.4% in Cedar hill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.