Demographics details for Mobile, AL vs Laurelville, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mobile, AL vs Laurelville, OH.
| Data | Mobile | Laurelville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 183,289 | 506 |
| Median Age | 37.6 years | 36.1 years |
| Median Income | $48,524 | $50,357 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 21% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Mobile vs Laurelville
- In Mobile, the population is higher at 183,289, compared to 506 in Laurelville.
- Residents in Mobile have a higher median age of 37.6 years compared to 36.1 years in Laurelville.
- Laurelville has a higher median income of $50,357, compared to $48,524 in Mobile.
- In Laurelville, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 30.0% in Mobile.
- Mobile has a higher poverty level at 21% compared to 12% in Laurelville.
- The unemployment rate in Mobile is higher at 3.9%, compared to 3.5% in Laurelville.
Demographics
Demographics Mobile vs Laurelville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mobile | Laurelville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 54 | Data is updating |
| White | 38 | 88 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mobile vs Laurelville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mobile at 54% compared to 0% in Laurelville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Laurelville at 88% compared to 38% in Mobile.
- The Asian population is larger in Mobile at 2% compared to 0% in Laurelville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mobile at 3% compared to 0% in Laurelville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Laurelville at 12%, compared to 3% in Mobile.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mobile and Laurelville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mobile | Laurelville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 20.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 14.8% |
| Depression | 21.7% | 26.8% |
| Smoking | 18.6% | 27.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 42.0% | 45.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mobile vs Laurelville
- In Laurelville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 19.3% in Mobile.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Laurelville at 26.8% versus 21.7% in Mobile.
- Laurelville has a higher smoking rate at 27.9% compared to 18.6% in Mobile.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Laurelville at 17.0% compared to 15.1% in Mobile.
- Laurelville has higher obesity rates at 45.9% compared to 42.0% in Mobile.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Laurelville at 20.0% compared to 13.0% in Mobile.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mobile | Laurelville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (1,270) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 18.4% (33,785) | 41.5% (210) |
| Less than High School | 9.4% (17,177) | 18.2% (92) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.9% (38,346) | 2.8% (14) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mobile vs Laurelville
- A higher percentage of residents in Mobile have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Laurelville.
- In Laurelville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 41.5% compared to 18.4% in Mobile.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Laurelville at 18.2%, compared to 9.4% in Mobile.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mobile hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.9% compared to 2.8% in Laurelville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.