Demographics details for Mobile, AL vs Fairburn, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mobile, AL vs Fairburn, GA.
| Data | Mobile | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 183,289 | 16,956 |
| Median Age | 37.6 years | 30.9 years |
| Median Income | $48,524 | $67,245 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 21% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Mobile vs Fairburn
- In Mobile, the population is higher at 183,289, compared to 16,956 in Fairburn.
- Residents in Mobile have a higher median age of 37.6 years compared to 30.9 years in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher median income of $67,245, compared to $48,524 in Mobile.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mobile at 30.0% compared to 20.0% in Fairburn.
- Mobile has a higher poverty level at 21% compared to 15% in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.9% in Mobile.
Demographics
Demographics Mobile vs Fairburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mobile | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 54 | 73 |
| White | 38 | 12 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mobile vs Fairburn
- In Fairburn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 73% compared to 54% in Mobile.
- Mobile has a higher percentage of White residents at 38% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- The Asian population is larger in Mobile at 2% compared to 0% in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 3% in Mobile.
- Both Mobile and Fairburn have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 3%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mobile and Fairburn at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mobile | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 21.7% | 16.8% |
| Smoking | 18.6% | 15.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 42.0% | 33.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mobile vs Fairburn
- More residents in Mobile report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 15.4% in Fairburn.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mobile at 21.7% compared to 16.8% in Fairburn.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mobile at 18.6% compared to 15.6% in Fairburn.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mobile at 15.1% compared to 15.0% in Fairburn.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mobile at 42.0% compared to 33.7% in Fairburn.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mobile at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in Fairburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mobile | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (1,270) | 0.5% (78) |
| High School Diploma | 18.4% (33,785) | 12.3% (2,082) |
| Less than High School | 9.4% (17,177) | 5.7% (961) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.9% (38,346) | 21.2% (3,591) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mobile vs Fairburn
- A higher percentage of residents in Mobile have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mobile hold a high school diploma at 18.4% compared to 12.3% in Fairburn.
- More residents in Mobile have less than a high school education at 9.4% compared to 5.7% in Fairburn.
- In Fairburn, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 20.9% in Mobile.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.