Demographics details for Mobile, AL vs College place, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mobile, AL vs College place, WA.
Data | Mobile | College place |
---|---|---|
Population | 183,289 | 9,804 |
Median Age | 37.6 years | 32.2 years |
Median Income | $48,524 | $60,417 |
Married Families | 30.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 21% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Mobile vs College place
- In Mobile, the population is higher at 183,289, compared to 9,804 in College place.
- Residents in Mobile have a higher median age of 37.6 years compared to 32.2 years in College place.
- College place has a higher median income of $60,417, compared to $48,524 in Mobile.
- In College place, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 30.0% in Mobile.
- Mobile has a higher poverty level at 21% compared to 10% in College place.
- College place has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.9% in Mobile.
Demographics
Demographics Mobile vs College place provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Mobile | College place |
---|---|---|
Black | 54 | Data is updating |
White | 38 | 72 |
Asian | 2 | 2 |
Hispanic | 3 | 18 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mobile vs College place
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mobile at 54% compared to 0% in College place.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in College place at 72% compared to 38% in Mobile.
- Both Mobile and College place have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- College place has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 3% in Mobile.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in College place at 8%, compared to 3% in Mobile.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mobile and College place at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Mobile | College place |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 16.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 10.9% |
Depression | 21.7% | 26.6% |
Smoking | 18.6% | 12.8% |
Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 17.6% |
Obesity | 42.0% | 32.7% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mobile vs College place
- More residents in Mobile report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 16.9% in College place.
- Higher depression rates are seen in College place at 26.6% versus 21.7% in Mobile.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mobile at 18.6% compared to 12.8% in College place.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in College place at 17.6% compared to 15.1% in Mobile.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mobile at 42.0% compared to 32.7% in College place.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in College place at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Mobile.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Mobile | College place |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (1,270) | 0.1% (14) |
High School Diploma | 18.4% (33,785) | 8.6% (847) |
Less than High School | 9.4% (17,177) | 13.2% (1,295) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.9% (38,346) | 22.7% (2,224) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mobile vs College place
- A higher percentage of residents in Mobile have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.1% in College place.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mobile hold a high school diploma at 18.4% compared to 8.6% in College place.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in College place at 13.2%, compared to 9.4% in Mobile.
- In College place, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.7% compared to 20.9% in Mobile.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.