Demographics details for Moberly, MO vs Kings mountain, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Moberly, MO vs Kings mountain, NC.
Data | Moberly | Kings mountain |
---|---|---|
Population | 13,774 | 11,638 |
Median Age | 37.5 years | 41.5 years |
Median Income | $39,332 | $45,301 |
Married Families | 27.0% | 24.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Moberly vs Kings mountain
- In Moberly, the population is higher at 13,774, compared to 11,638 in Kings mountain.
- The median age in Kings mountain is higher at 41.5 years, compared to 37.5 years in Moberly.
- Kings mountain has a higher median income of $45,301, compared to $39,332 in Moberly.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Moberly at 27.0% compared to 24.0% in Kings mountain.
- Moberly has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 11% in Kings mountain.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Moberly and Kings mountain at 4.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Moberly vs Kings mountain provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Moberly | Kings mountain |
---|---|---|
Black | 9 | 25 |
White | 81 | 68 |
Asian | 1 | 2 |
Hispanic | 3 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Moberly vs Kings mountain
- In Kings mountain, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 25% compared to 9% in Moberly.
- Moberly has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 68% in Kings mountain.
- In Kings mountain, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Moberly.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Moberly at 3% compared to 2% in Kings mountain.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Moberly at 6% compared to 3% in Kings mountain.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Moberly and Kings mountain at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Moberly | Kings mountain |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 18.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.9% | 13.1% |
Depression | 26.1% | 25.7% |
Smoking | 24.6% | 20.9% |
Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 16.3% |
Obesity | 44.1% | 38.0% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Moberly vs Kings mountain
- More residents in Moberly report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 18.3% in Kings mountain.
- Depression is more prevalent in Moberly at 26.1% compared to 25.7% in Kings mountain.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Moberly at 24.6% compared to 20.9% in Kings mountain.
- Binge drinking is more common in Moberly at 16.6% compared to 16.3% in Kings mountain.
- Obesity rates are higher in Moberly at 44.1% compared to 38.0% in Kings mountain.
- Disability percentages are higher in Moberly at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Kings mountain.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Moberly | Kings mountain |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (132) | 0.4% (43) |
High School Diploma | 22.9% (3,149) | 21.7% (2,528) |
Less than High School | 14.7% (2,021) | 17.8% (2,071) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.0% (1,514) | 11.6% (1,353) |
Education Levels Comparison: Moberly vs Kings mountain
- A higher percentage of residents in Moberly have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.4% in Kings mountain.
- A higher percentage of residents in Moberly hold a high school diploma at 22.9% compared to 21.7% in Kings mountain.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Kings mountain at 17.8%, compared to 14.7% in Moberly.
- In Kings mountain, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.6% compared to 11.0% in Moberly.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.