Demographics details for Mitchell, IN vs Summerfield, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mitchell, IN vs Summerfield, NC.
| Data | Mitchell | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,940 | 11,111 |
| Median Age | 35.5 years | 45.1 years |
| Median Income | $51,025 | $148,182 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 52.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Mitchell vs Summerfield
- The population in Summerfield is higher at 11,111, compared to 3,940 in Mitchell.
- The median age in Summerfield is higher at 45.1 years, compared to 35.5 years in Mitchell.
- Summerfield has a higher median income of $148,182, compared to $51,025 in Mitchell.
- In Summerfield, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 32.0% in Mitchell.
- Mitchell has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 7% in Summerfield.
- The unemployment rate in Mitchell is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.4% in Summerfield.
Demographics
Demographics Mitchell vs Summerfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mitchell | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 5 |
| White | 92 | 82 |
| Asian | 4 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mitchell vs Summerfield
- In Summerfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Mitchell.
- Mitchell has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 82% in Summerfield.
- Both Mitchell and Summerfield have the same percentage of Asian residents at 4%.
- Summerfield has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 1% in Mitchell.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Summerfield at 4%, compared to 2% in Mitchell.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mitchell and Summerfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mitchell | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 13.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 8.2% |
| Depression | 28.5% | 22.6% |
| Smoking | 24.3% | 10.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 19.5% |
| Obesity | 43.5% | 28.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mitchell vs Summerfield
- More residents in Mitchell report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 13.0% in Summerfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mitchell at 28.5% compared to 22.6% in Summerfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mitchell at 24.3% compared to 10.6% in Summerfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Summerfield at 19.5% compared to 15.9% in Mitchell.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mitchell at 43.5% compared to 28.7% in Summerfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mitchell at 21.0% compared to 12.0% in Summerfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mitchell | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (63) | 1.0% (109) |
| High School Diploma | 20.4% (802) | 8.8% (973) |
| Less than High School | 29.2% (1,152) | 6.1% (674) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.8% (387) | 38.9% (4,326) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mitchell vs Summerfield
- A higher percentage of residents in Mitchell have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 1.0% in Summerfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mitchell hold a high school diploma at 20.4% compared to 8.8% in Summerfield.
- More residents in Mitchell have less than a high school education at 29.2% compared to 6.1% in Summerfield.
- In Summerfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 9.8% in Mitchell.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.