Demographics details for Mitchell, IN vs Forrest city, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mitchell, IN vs Forrest city, AR.
Data | Mitchell | Forrest city |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,940 | 12,676 |
Median Age | 35.5 years | 35.2 years |
Median Income | $51,025 | $36,368 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 22.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 20% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Mitchell vs Forrest city
- The population in Forrest city is higher at 12,676, compared to 3,940 in Mitchell.
- Residents in Mitchell have a higher median age of 35.5 years compared to 35.2 years in Forrest city.
- Mitchell has a higher median income of $51,025 compared to $36,368 in Forrest city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mitchell at 32.0% compared to 22.0% in Forrest city.
- The poverty level is higher in Forrest city at 20%, compared to 10% in Mitchell.
- Forrest city has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 3.5% in Mitchell.
Demographics
Demographics Mitchell vs Forrest city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Mitchell | Forrest city |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 73 |
White | 92 | 16 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 1 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Mitchell vs Forrest city
- In Forrest city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 73% compared to 1% in Mitchell.
- Mitchell has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 16% in Forrest city.
- The Asian population is larger in Mitchell at 4% compared to 0% in Forrest city.
- Forrest city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 1% in Mitchell.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Forrest city at 4%, compared to 2% in Mitchell.
- In Forrest city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Mitchell.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Mitchell | Forrest city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 19.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 16.5% |
Depression | 28.5% | 21.2% |
Smoking | 24.3% | 26.2% |
Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 12.5% |
Obesity | 43.5% | 49.7% |
Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mitchell vs Forrest city
- In Forrest city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 19.4% in Mitchell.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mitchell at 28.5% compared to 21.2% in Forrest city.
- Forrest city has a higher smoking rate at 26.2% compared to 24.3% in Mitchell.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mitchell at 15.9% compared to 12.5% in Forrest city.
- Forrest city has higher obesity rates at 49.7% compared to 43.5% in Mitchell.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mitchell at 21.0% compared to 15.0% in Forrest city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Mitchell | Forrest city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.6% (63) | 0.8% (105) |
High School Diploma | 20.4% (802) | 21.3% (2,698) |
Less than High School | 29.2% (1,152) | 17.7% (2,241) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.8% (387) | 8.9% (1,122) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mitchell vs Forrest city
- A higher percentage of residents in Mitchell have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.8% in Forrest city.
- In Forrest city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.3% compared to 20.4% in Mitchell.
- More residents in Mitchell have less than a high school education at 29.2% compared to 17.7% in Forrest city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mitchell hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.8% compared to 8.9% in Forrest city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.