Demographics details for Mission viejo, CA vs Charlotte, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mission viejo, CA vs Charlotte, TN.
Data | Mission viejo | Charlotte |
---|---|---|
Population | 91,776 | 1,674 |
Median Age | 46.0 years | 36.8 years |
Median Income | $136,570 | $57,188 |
Married Families | 51.0% | 46.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Mission viejo vs Charlotte
- In Mission viejo, the population is higher at 91,776, compared to 1,674 in Charlotte.
- Residents in Mission viejo have a higher median age of 46.0 years compared to 36.8 years in Charlotte.
- Mission viejo has a higher median income of $136,570 compared to $57,188 in Charlotte.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mission viejo at 51.0% compared to 46.0% in Charlotte.
- The poverty level is higher in Charlotte at 14%, compared to 7% in Mission viejo.
- Charlotte has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 4.0% in Mission viejo.
Demographics
Demographics Mission viejo vs Charlotte provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Mission viejo | Charlotte |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 6 |
White | 53 | 82 |
Asian | 14 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 20 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 12 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Mission viejo vs Charlotte
- In Charlotte, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 1% in Mission viejo.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Charlotte at 82% compared to 53% in Mission viejo.
- The Asian population is larger in Mission viejo at 14% compared to 0% in Charlotte.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mission viejo at 20% compared to 4% in Charlotte.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mission viejo at 12% compared to 6% in Charlotte.
- In Charlotte, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Mission viejo.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Mission viejo | Charlotte |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.9% | 20.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 14.7% |
Depression | 18.2% | 28.8% |
Smoking | 8.6% | 25.3% |
Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 16.0% |
Obesity | 24.6% | 38.9% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mission viejo vs Charlotte
- In Charlotte, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 13.9% in Mission viejo.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Charlotte at 28.8% versus 18.2% in Mission viejo.
- Charlotte has a higher smoking rate at 25.3% compared to 8.6% in Mission viejo.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mission viejo at 18.3% compared to 16.0% in Charlotte.
- Charlotte has higher obesity rates at 38.9% compared to 24.6% in Mission viejo.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Charlotte at 27.0% compared to 10.0% in Mission viejo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Mission viejo | Charlotte |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (1,198) | 0.4% (6) |
High School Diploma | 10.5% (9,625) | 25.3% (424) |
Less than High School | 8.2% (7,480) | 26.0% (436) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.2% (35,022) | 9.9% (166) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mission viejo vs Charlotte
- A higher percentage of residents in Mission viejo have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.4% in Charlotte.
- In Charlotte, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.3% compared to 10.5% in Mission viejo.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Charlotte at 26.0%, compared to 8.2% in Mission viejo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mission viejo hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.2% compared to 9.9% in Charlotte.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.