Demographics details for Millington, TN vs Clinton, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Millington, TN vs Clinton, SC.
| Data | Millington | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,442 | 7,554 |
| Median Age | 38.9 years | 35.4 years |
| Median Income | $49,543 | $38,350 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 19.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Millington vs Clinton
- In Millington, the population is higher at 10,442, compared to 7,554 in Clinton.
- Residents in Millington have a higher median age of 38.9 years compared to 35.4 years in Clinton.
- Millington has a higher median income of $49,543 compared to $38,350 in Clinton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Millington at 34.0% compared to 19.0% in Clinton.
- The poverty level is higher in Clinton at 18%, compared to 12% in Millington.
- Clinton has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Millington.
Demographics
Demographics Millington vs Clinton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Millington | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 31 | 38 |
| White | 50 | 55 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 11 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Millington vs Clinton
- In Clinton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 31% in Millington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Clinton at 55% compared to 50% in Millington.
- Both Millington and Clinton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Millington at 11% compared to 1% in Clinton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Millington at 6% compared to 4% in Clinton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Millington and Clinton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Millington | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 24.8% | 23.7% |
| Smoking | 21.7% | 22.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 36.3% | 44.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Millington vs Clinton
- More residents in Millington report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 19.1% in Clinton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Millington at 24.8% compared to 23.7% in Clinton.
- Clinton has a higher smoking rate at 22.0% compared to 21.7% in Millington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Millington at 16.1% compared to 15.8% in Clinton.
- Clinton has higher obesity rates at 44.9% compared to 36.3% in Millington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Millington at 19.0% compared to 17.0% in Clinton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Millington | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (111) | 1.0% (74) |
| High School Diploma | 18.9% (1,978) | 19.3% (1,460) |
| Less than High School | 12.9% (1,352) | 15.6% (1,177) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.2% (1,375) | 17.3% (1,310) |
Education Levels Comparison: Millington vs Clinton
- A higher percentage of residents in Millington have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 1.0% in Clinton.
- In Clinton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.3% compared to 18.9% in Millington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clinton at 15.6%, compared to 12.9% in Millington.
- In Clinton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 13.2% in Millington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.