Demographics details for Milledgeville, GA vs Leominster, MA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Milledgeville, GA vs Leominster, MA.

Data Milledgeville Leominster
Population 16,837 43,646
Median Age 26.5 years 43.0 years
Median Income $40,672 $75,620
Married Families 20.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 24% 9%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 4.2

Population Comparison: Milledgeville vs Leominster

  • The population in Leominster is higher at 43,646, compared to 16,837 in Milledgeville.
  • The median age in Leominster is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 26.5 years in Milledgeville.
  • Leominster has a higher median income of $75,620, compared to $40,672 in Milledgeville.
  • In Leominster, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 20.0% in Milledgeville.
  • Milledgeville has a higher poverty level at 24% compared to 9% in Leominster.
  • The unemployment rate in Milledgeville is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.2% in Leominster.

Demographics

Demographics Milledgeville vs Leominster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Milledgeville Leominster
Black 45 6
White 47 67
Asian 3 3
Hispanic 3 14
Two or More Races 2 10
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Milledgeville vs Leominster

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Milledgeville at 45% compared to 6% in Leominster.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Leominster at 67% compared to 47% in Milledgeville.
  • Both Milledgeville and Leominster have the same percentage of Asian residents at 3%.
  • Leominster has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 3% in Milledgeville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Leominster at 10%, compared to 2% in Milledgeville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Milledgeville and Leominster at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Milledgeville Leominster
Mental Health Not Good 18.3% 17.9%
Physical Health Not Good 14.1% 10.6%
Depression 20.6% 23.5%
Smoking 21.1% 15.5%
Binge Drinking 14.2% 16.9%
Obesity 42.7% 32.8%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Milledgeville vs Leominster

  • More residents in Milledgeville report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 17.9% in Leominster.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Leominster at 23.5% versus 20.6% in Milledgeville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Milledgeville at 21.1% compared to 15.5% in Leominster.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Leominster at 16.9% compared to 14.2% in Milledgeville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Milledgeville at 42.7% compared to 32.8% in Leominster.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Milledgeville at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Leominster.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Milledgeville Leominster
No Schooling 0.8% (139) 1.1% (477)
High School Diploma 11.0% (1,844) 18.2% (7,932)
Less than High School 12.1% (2,041) 13.5% (5,889)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.3% (2,237) 24.1% (10,530)

Education Levels Comparison: Milledgeville vs Leominster

  • In Leominster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.8% in Milledgeville.
  • In Leominster, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.2% compared to 11.0% in Milledgeville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Leominster at 13.5%, compared to 12.1% in Milledgeville.
  • In Leominster, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.1% compared to 13.3% in Milledgeville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.