Demographics details for Milledgeville, GA vs Ho ho kus, NJ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Milledgeville, GA vs Ho ho kus, NJ.

Data Milledgeville Ho ho kus
Population 16,837 4,216
Median Age 26.5 years 43.0 years
Median Income $40,672 $250,001
Married Families 20.0% 52.0%
Poverty Level 24% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 4.5 2.5

Population Comparison: Milledgeville vs Ho ho kus

  • In Milledgeville, the population is higher at 16,837, compared to 4,216 in Ho ho kus.
  • The median age in Ho ho kus is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 26.5 years in Milledgeville.
  • Ho ho kus has a higher median income of $250,001, compared to $40,672 in Milledgeville.
  • In Ho ho kus, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 20.0% in Milledgeville.
  • Milledgeville has a higher poverty level at 24% compared to 0% in Ho ho kus.
  • The unemployment rate in Milledgeville is higher at 4.5%, compared to 2.5% in Ho ho kus.

Demographics

Demographics Milledgeville vs Ho ho kus provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Milledgeville Ho ho kus
Black 45 1
White 47 67
Asian 3 12
Hispanic 3 12
Two or More Races 2 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Milledgeville vs Ho ho kus

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Milledgeville at 45% compared to 1% in Ho ho kus.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Ho ho kus at 67% compared to 47% in Milledgeville.
  • In Ho ho kus, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 3% in Milledgeville.
  • Ho ho kus has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 3% in Milledgeville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ho ho kus at 8%, compared to 2% in Milledgeville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Milledgeville and Ho ho kus at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Milledgeville Ho ho kus
Mental Health Not Good 18.3% 11.2%
Physical Health Not Good 14.1% 5.8%
Depression 20.6% 16.6%
Smoking 21.1% 6.9%
Binge Drinking 14.2% 19.6%
Obesity 42.7% 21.9%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 5.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Milledgeville vs Ho ho kus

  • More residents in Milledgeville report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 11.2% in Ho ho kus.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Milledgeville at 20.6% compared to 16.6% in Ho ho kus.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Milledgeville at 21.1% compared to 6.9% in Ho ho kus.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Ho ho kus at 19.6% compared to 14.2% in Milledgeville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Milledgeville at 42.7% compared to 21.9% in Ho ho kus.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Milledgeville at 13.0% compared to 5.0% in Ho ho kus.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Milledgeville Ho ho kus
No Schooling 0.8% (139) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 11.0% (1,844) 2.8% (117)
Less than High School 12.1% (2,041) 2.0% (83)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.3% (2,237) 51.4% (2,167)

Education Levels Comparison: Milledgeville vs Ho ho kus

  • A higher percentage of residents in Milledgeville have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Ho ho kus.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Milledgeville hold a high school diploma at 11.0% compared to 2.8% in Ho ho kus.
  • More residents in Milledgeville have less than a high school education at 12.1% compared to 2.0% in Ho ho kus.
  • In Ho ho kus, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 51.4% compared to 13.3% in Milledgeville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.