Demographics details for Milledgeville, GA vs Flomaton, AL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Milledgeville, GA vs Flomaton, AL.

Data Milledgeville Flomaton
Population 16,837 1,458
Median Age 26.5 years 32.6 years
Median Income $40,672 $37,500
Married Families 20.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 24% 15%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 5.2

Population Comparison: Milledgeville vs Flomaton

  • In Milledgeville, the population is higher at 16,837, compared to 1,458 in Flomaton.
  • The median age in Flomaton is higher at 32.6 years, compared to 26.5 years in Milledgeville.
  • Milledgeville has a higher median income of $40,672 compared to $37,500 in Flomaton.
  • In Flomaton, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 20.0% in Milledgeville.
  • Milledgeville has a higher poverty level at 24% compared to 15% in Flomaton.
  • Flomaton has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.5% in Milledgeville.

Demographics

Demographics Milledgeville vs Flomaton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Milledgeville Flomaton
Black 45 38
White 47 58
Asian 3 Data is updating
Hispanic 3 Data is updating
Two or More Races 2 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Milledgeville vs Flomaton

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Milledgeville at 45% compared to 38% in Flomaton.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Flomaton at 58% compared to 47% in Milledgeville.
  • The Asian population is larger in Milledgeville at 3% compared to 0% in Flomaton.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Milledgeville at 3% compared to 0% in Flomaton.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Flomaton at 4%, compared to 2% in Milledgeville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Milledgeville and Flomaton at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Milledgeville Flomaton
Mental Health Not Good 18.3% 21.3%
Physical Health Not Good 14.1% 15.3%
Depression 20.6% 24.6%
Smoking 21.1% 24.1%
Binge Drinking 14.2% 13.7%
Obesity 42.7% 45.3%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 19.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Milledgeville vs Flomaton

  • In Flomaton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 18.3% in Milledgeville.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Flomaton at 24.6% versus 20.6% in Milledgeville.
  • Flomaton has a higher smoking rate at 24.1% compared to 21.1% in Milledgeville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Milledgeville at 14.2% compared to 13.7% in Flomaton.
  • Flomaton has higher obesity rates at 45.3% compared to 42.7% in Milledgeville.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Flomaton at 19.0% compared to 13.0% in Milledgeville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Milledgeville Flomaton
No Schooling 0.8% (139) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 11.0% (1,844) 25.0% (364)
Less than High School 12.1% (2,041) 19.1% (278)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.3% (2,237) 9.4% (137)

Education Levels Comparison: Milledgeville vs Flomaton

  • A higher percentage of residents in Milledgeville have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Flomaton.
  • In Flomaton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.0% compared to 11.0% in Milledgeville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Flomaton at 19.1%, compared to 12.1% in Milledgeville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Milledgeville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.3% compared to 9.4% in Flomaton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.