Demographics details for Milford, UT vs Thomaston, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Milford, UT vs Thomaston, GA.
| Data | Milford | Thomaston |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,454 | 9,858 |
| Median Age | 24.8 years | 36.7 years |
| Median Income | $83,783 | $30,298 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 23.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 28% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Milford vs Thomaston
- The population in Thomaston is higher at 9,858, compared to 1,454 in Milford.
- The median age in Thomaston is higher at 36.7 years, compared to 24.8 years in Milford.
- Milford has a higher median income of $83,783 compared to $30,298 in Thomaston.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Milford at 50.0% compared to 23.0% in Thomaston.
- The poverty level is higher in Thomaston at 28%, compared to 10% in Milford.
- Thomaston has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.2% in Milford.
Demographics
Demographics Milford vs Thomaston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Milford | Thomaston |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 38 |
| White | 74 | 56 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 19 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 2 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Milford vs Thomaston
- In Thomaston, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 0% in Milford.
- Milford has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 56% in Thomaston.
- In Thomaston, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Milford.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Milford at 19% compared to 3% in Thomaston.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Milford at 6% compared to 2% in Thomaston.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Milford at 1% compared to 0% in Thomaston.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Milford | Thomaston |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 23.5% | 22.4% |
| Smoking | 12.4% | 22.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.2% | 13.9% |
| Obesity | 34.2% | 39.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Milford vs Thomaston
- In Thomaston, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 17.2% in Milford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Milford at 23.5% compared to 22.4% in Thomaston.
- Thomaston has a higher smoking rate at 22.2% compared to 12.4% in Milford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Thomaston at 13.9% compared to 13.2% in Milford.
- Thomaston has higher obesity rates at 39.8% compared to 34.2% in Milford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Thomaston at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Milford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Milford | Thomaston |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (5) | 2.7% (264) |
| High School Diploma | 14.7% (214) | 14.9% (1,473) |
| Less than High School | 3.1% (45) | 13.3% (1,308) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.8% (244) | 11.7% (1,153) |
Education Levels Comparison: Milford vs Thomaston
- In Thomaston, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.3% in Milford.
- In Thomaston, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.9% compared to 14.7% in Milford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Thomaston at 13.3%, compared to 3.1% in Milford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Milford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.8% compared to 11.7% in Thomaston.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.