Demographics details for Milford, UT vs Parksley, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Milford, UT vs Parksley, VA.
| Data | Milford | Parksley |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,454 | 808 |
| Median Age | 24.8 years | 43.6 years |
| Median Income | $83,783 | $74,844 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Milford vs Parksley
- In Milford, the population is higher at 1,454, compared to 808 in Parksley.
- The median age in Parksley is higher at 43.6 years, compared to 24.8 years in Milford.
- Milford has a higher median income of $83,783 compared to $74,844 in Parksley.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Milford at 50.0% compared to 31.0% in Parksley.
- Milford has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Parksley.
- Parksley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Milford.
Demographics
Demographics Milford vs Parksley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Milford | Parksley |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 35 |
| White | 74 | 46 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 19 | 13 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Milford vs Parksley
- In Parksley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 35% compared to 0% in Milford.
- Milford has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 46% in Parksley.
- Both Milford and Parksley have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Milford at 19% compared to 13% in Parksley.
- Both Milford and Parksley have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 6%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Milford at 1% compared to 0% in Parksley.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Milford | Parksley |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 18.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 14.4% |
| Depression | 23.5% | 23.3% |
| Smoking | 12.4% | 22.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.2% | 15.6% |
| Obesity | 34.2% | 40.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Milford vs Parksley
- In Parksley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 17.2% in Milford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Milford at 23.5% compared to 23.3% in Parksley.
- Parksley has a higher smoking rate at 22.6% compared to 12.4% in Milford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Parksley at 15.6% compared to 13.2% in Milford.
- Parksley has higher obesity rates at 40.0% compared to 34.2% in Milford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Milford at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Parksley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Milford | Parksley |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (5) | 2.0% (16) |
| High School Diploma | 14.7% (214) | 19.1% (154) |
| Less than High School | 3.1% (45) | 22.3% (180) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.8% (244) | 17.9% (145) |
Education Levels Comparison: Milford vs Parksley
- In Parksley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.3% in Milford.
- In Parksley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.1% compared to 14.7% in Milford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Parksley at 22.3%, compared to 3.1% in Milford.
- In Parksley, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.9% compared to 16.8% in Milford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.