Demographics details for Milford, UT vs Okemah, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Milford, UT vs Okemah, OK.
| Data | Milford | Okemah |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,454 | 3,010 |
| Median Age | 24.8 years | 34.1 years |
| Median Income | $83,783 | $34,882 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Milford vs Okemah
- The population in Okemah is higher at 3,010, compared to 1,454 in Milford.
- The median age in Okemah is higher at 34.1 years, compared to 24.8 years in Milford.
- Milford has a higher median income of $83,783 compared to $34,882 in Okemah.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Milford at 50.0% compared to 28.0% in Okemah.
- The poverty level is higher in Okemah at 20%, compared to 10% in Milford.
- Okemah has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Milford.
Demographics
Demographics Milford vs Okemah provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Milford | Okemah |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 74 | 54 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 19 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 14 |
| American Indian | 1 | 23 |
Demographics Comparison: Milford vs Okemah
- In Okemah, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Milford.
- Milford has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 54% in Okemah.
- Both Milford and Okemah have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Milford at 19% compared to 7% in Okemah.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Okemah at 14%, compared to 6% in Milford.
- In Okemah, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 23%, compared to 1% in Milford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Milford | Okemah |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 22.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 17.5% |
| Depression | 23.5% | 28.0% |
| Smoking | 12.4% | 29.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.2% | 13.1% |
| Obesity | 34.2% | 43.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Milford vs Okemah
- In Okemah, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.8% compared to 17.2% in Milford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Okemah at 28.0% versus 23.5% in Milford.
- Okemah has a higher smoking rate at 29.3% compared to 12.4% in Milford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Milford at 13.2% compared to 13.1% in Okemah.
- Okemah has higher obesity rates at 43.8% compared to 34.2% in Milford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Okemah at 17.0% compared to 14.0% in Milford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Milford | Okemah |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (5) | 0.4% (11) |
| High School Diploma | 14.7% (214) | 24.8% (746) |
| Less than High School | 3.1% (45) | 17.5% (528) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.8% (244) | 6.1% (183) |
Education Levels Comparison: Milford vs Okemah
- In Okemah, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.3% in Milford.
- In Okemah, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.8% compared to 14.7% in Milford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Okemah at 17.5%, compared to 3.1% in Milford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Milford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.8% compared to 6.1% in Okemah.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.