Demographics details for Midland, TX vs Union springs, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Midland, TX vs Union springs, AL.
| Data | Midland | Union springs |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 134,444 | 3,242 |
| Median Age | 31.4 years | 28.1 years |
| Median Income | $90,448 | $24,921 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 17.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 25% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.9 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Midland vs Union springs
- In Midland, the population is higher at 134,444, compared to 3,242 in Union springs.
- Residents in Midland have a higher median age of 31.4 years compared to 28.1 years in Union springs.
- Midland has a higher median income of $90,448 compared to $24,921 in Union springs.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Midland at 40.0% compared to 17.0% in Union springs.
- The poverty level is higher in Union springs at 25%, compared to 12% in Midland.
- Union springs has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 2.9% in Midland.
Demographics
Demographics Midland vs Union springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Midland | Union springs |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 69 |
| White | 29 | 4 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 45 | 22 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Midland vs Union springs
- In Union springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 69% compared to 8% in Midland.
- Midland has a higher percentage of White residents at 29% compared to 4% in Union springs.
- The Asian population is larger in Midland at 2% compared to 1% in Union springs.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Midland at 45% compared to 22% in Union springs.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Midland at 15% compared to 4% in Union springs.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Midland at 1% compared to 0% in Union springs.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Midland | Union springs |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.1% | 21.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 16.9% |
| Depression | 21.4% | 20.8% |
| Smoking | 15.0% | 25.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.6% | 11.1% |
| Obesity | 35.3% | 49.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Midland vs Union springs
- In Union springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 16.1% in Midland.
- Depression is more prevalent in Midland at 21.4% compared to 20.8% in Union springs.
- Union springs has a higher smoking rate at 25.5% compared to 15.0% in Midland.
- Binge drinking is more common in Midland at 18.6% compared to 11.1% in Union springs.
- Union springs has higher obesity rates at 49.5% compared to 35.3% in Midland.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Union springs at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Midland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Midland | Union springs |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.8% (3,705) | 3.6% (117) |
| High School Diploma | 10.2% (13,724) | 15.1% (489) |
| Less than High School | 17.6% (23,705) | 33.7% (1,092) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.5% (26,213) | 7.3% (237) |
Education Levels Comparison: Midland vs Union springs
- In Union springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 2.8% in Midland.
- In Union springs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.1% compared to 10.2% in Midland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Union springs at 33.7%, compared to 17.6% in Midland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Midland hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.5% compared to 7.3% in Union springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.